Message from @sandwitch

Discord ID: 638481003383488516


2019-10-28 20:53:26 UTC  

Gross

2019-10-28 20:53:30 UTC  

What is the age in Britain?

2019-10-28 20:53:33 UTC  

18 aswell?

2019-10-28 20:53:35 UTC  

18

2019-10-28 20:53:38 UTC  

cool

2019-10-28 20:53:44 UTC  

Indeeda

2019-10-28 20:53:52 UTC  

yeah, there are libs in the US who want to lower it to 16

2019-10-28 20:53:57 UTC  

All the libs want to make the voting age 16 but that's retarded

2019-10-28 20:54:04 UTC  

yes

2019-10-28 20:54:08 UTC  

25

2019-10-28 20:54:32 UTC  

Like you have to account for students retardedness to vote for parties who say "no student fees" in shit

2019-10-28 20:54:40 UTC  

yeah

2019-10-28 20:54:40 UTC  

Students wont vote

2019-10-28 20:54:45 UTC  

Because they dont care

2019-10-28 20:54:51 UTC  

Not after Brexit

2019-10-28 20:54:52 UTC  

its bad enough with all this college debt in the US

2019-10-28 20:55:03 UTC  

Political studies classes have gone up by 30% over here

2019-10-28 20:55:13 UTC  

The college students are falling to the left

2019-10-28 20:55:18 UTC  

^

2019-10-28 20:55:31 UTC  

I hope my generation is smarter when college comes for us

2019-10-28 20:55:33 UTC  

All public schools should be unbiased in their teachings

2019-10-28 20:55:39 UTC  

the oldest are in college now

2019-10-28 20:55:51 UTC  

but i myself, will not take a loan for college

2019-10-28 20:56:02 UTC  

If i don't have a full scholarship

2019-10-28 20:56:09 UTC  

im going to community college

2019-10-28 20:56:11 UTC  

Fair

2019-10-28 21:03:26 UTC  

property ownership, net tax positive in last 5 years and one year of military/public service is only answer to voting rights

2019-10-28 21:04:36 UTC  

married couples can't do their taxes together to exclude all net takers from elections

2019-10-28 21:14:12 UTC  

Why would you want a Plutocracy lol?

2019-10-29 01:19:52 UTC  

It's not really a problem of who can vote but how.

2019-10-29 01:20:35 UTC  

Representative democracy doesn't do a good job at keeping its voter base informed, and the media deliberately keeps it this way

2019-10-29 01:22:27 UTC  

Party politics and the media circus drummed up at election time aids in voters turning it into nothing more than a sportsball game where they just want "their" party to win no matter how shit they are.

2019-10-29 01:22:43 UTC  

In effect, the multiple party system is a sham.

2019-10-29 01:24:53 UTC  

Anybody who is seriously working outside of the two parties in the real world knows this. You can explain every aspect of your policy and get somebody to agree but they still won't vote for you because they've got some Game of Thrones blood oath to their party "because my dad voted for them, and so did his dad and I'm gonna uphold the tradition" or whatever the fuck.

2019-10-29 01:25:16 UTC  

It's a waste of time.

2019-10-29 01:29:40 UTC  

It should be a one-party system where individuals vote according to the field they work in (agriculture, industry, etc.) which exists to advise the government how best to proceed on certain policies. That's the only way I can plausibly see informed votes happening.

2019-10-29 08:27:51 UTC  

>plutocracy
dude, anyone working and responsible with money can buy a house and be net positive

2019-10-29 08:27:57 UTC  

leftist retard

2019-10-29 08:56:07 UTC  

Please explain to me how someone can just acquire a couple tens to a hundred thousand in cash my dude

2019-10-29 08:57:44 UTC  

Not to mention that such a system would create a pretty huge bubble as people would be rushing to buy real estate once it’s implemented lul

2019-10-29 09:01:23 UTC  

Oh and maybe define how much “property ownership” yad need to qualify to vote because like that you’d just create the bizarre trend of people buying micro patches of land or buying empty houses without actually living in them