Message from @Maksim
Discord ID: 647927756755304448
Bit of both
^
I could go with that.
@Attika During the 1950's the government burned anti-state books, suppressed anti-state speech and banned anti-state articles from being published
Is that what you mean?
Yes
Nice
I think the state should allow dissenting opinions and freedom of speech, but not popular anti-state speech and anti-nationalist ideas.
Pornography should be banned as well, requiring government control over the internet
Social media platforms should be nationalized
Yes.
Allowing some dissenting opinions creates a snowball effect
Porn would go through a slow phase of being uprooted imo
I came up with a better system of allowing dissenting opinions
Being socially shunned like smoking is, and then gradually banned
Oh?
Ban dissenting opinions completely, but if you have a dissenting opinion you can write a letter and send it directly to the leader for consideration, this also works as a direct means of suggestions to government
@☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭ Yes. Rig the social system to punish dissenting views instead of banning it
You wouldn't be punished for writing dissenting opinions in a letter directly to the leader
Government bans will make it *hip* or *cool* to oppose the *man*
Trick is encouraging the society to turn on homosexuals and dissenters
Hang them
Could just set a bar for what 'dissent' is. Like for me, disagreement with certain small policy is not the same as outright sedition
Schools
The only way you could be an enemy of the state is if you are either a Capitalist or anti-White
Make sure they are taught anti gay information
@☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭ You faimilar with maxim Gorky?
Yes
Eliminate homosexuality and fascism will vanish
Gorky was based
Yes. And I think it should be okay to say “I disagree with this policy because of etc etc etc” just not “Whites are evil.”
I’m a capitalist.
Don't
Unless you're like a CEO or some shit
Don't get on capitalism topic
I doubt it
Don't
It'll drag on for years