Message from @Maksim
Discord ID: 651589989196627979
still cringe
@ʙɪɢ βɵʂʂ 𠄩 That's not why any fascist system collapsed but ok
For example, the region of Europe we refer to as Germany was a rich tapestry of local cultures and systems that worked well enough for them, and any attempt to create a "german" nationalism, such as the Nazis, is basically built on a fantasy
And fascism is cringe
@ʙɪɢ βɵʂʂ 𠄩 What?
German nationalism has been a thing since it was United
no one tell him about Bismarck
And even before, but no one has enough power to unite it
Lol exactly
Until Bismarck
I know who Bismarck was, I'm not a moron
Dollfuss was pretty based, because he recognized that Pan Germanism didn't work
cameralists get the bullet too
They do
Moldbug is gay
His philosophy is alright though
Anyway, I don't believe in multiculturalism, and because nationalism attempts to smush hundreds of cultures into one, it is inherently so.
That's not correct but ok
Nationalism is the creation of a state of a nation, pretty simple
There is no such thing as a common culture, heritage or language on the scale of tens or hundreds of kilometers.
Microcultures are irrelevant
You then could argue that even communities shoudlnt exist
Because each family has its own microculture
Did you know that France had dozens of languages? The Parisians tried to genocide as many as they could.
And heritage
France is an illegitimate state and is irrelevant to this conversation
I agree
A common culture can exist between hundreds of kilometers, and does
Do small and minute differences exist? Yes
Are they at all relevant? No
Well, maxim, the way that anarchists believe in throwing away every unnecessary authority, I believe in throwing away every unnecessary grouping of people together, and unless we plan to live in caves, a family-only "society" is impossible, so the town or village is the next best thing.
>maxim
My name is literally like right there
Come on now
Oops sorry lol
Why are they irrelevant? Who decides that
The common culture did
Minute differences don't cause catastrophic schisms in culture divides
If the common culture is artificial, and it still somehow gets to decide the relevancy of real cultures, isn't this a silly line of argument?