Message from @Riley
Discord ID: 651877590126166026
@cool guy swag can *you* prove god?
Read Thomas Aquinas
there are literally entire bodies of theology dedicated to proving god
Oh my fucking Darwin
lmao
enough with Thomas Aquinas
"bro what's 2 + 2, but don't answer with any of that '4' stuff"
darwin was Christian
like what
enough with this hebrew nonsense and off yourself, tranny
Literally every Christian pulls the Aquinas card out of their ass when confronted
and its getting old
<:garfilf:606968189640769668>
Because Aquinas had studied like centuries of literature and dogma??
I don't care
"bro stop CITING SOURCES"
"read aquinas" is not citing a source
<:garfilf:606968189640769668>
its a command
low IQ Christoid
he's a theologian so it counts as a source
read augustine
and ive read his five ways and stuff
and they arent convincing
read Summa Theologica
okay then we're arguing from a subjective standpoint; even if somebody *can* prove that god exists, you can just go "well it doesn't look like proof to me"
no, i look at their argument and determine whether or not i believe it
which is what i did with Aquinas
your critiques show everyone that u have not actually understood what u have read
okay well run through with me, what were your critiques?
ok ill go over this for the thousandth time
lets start with the firsts one
now i like to have a dialogue, not a monologue
im gonna need a drink for this thirst cause
so please recite the first way
bruh
okay so number one of the first way, our senses prove that some things are in motion
number two, things move when potential motion becomes actual motion,
any objections so far?