Message from @☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭
Discord ID: 658100520455634994
I'm shocked you won't provide me a reason as to how it's slavery.
Second time repeating this—If slaves could choose to work on plantations and if they did work got 6 figures I would unironically be pro-slavery
one person makes it a law that another person gets free health care because "reasons"...who is to do that labor? and who pays for it?
The healthcare professionals and the government pays for it
at some point you are stealing from peoples pockets to pay for it
with what money?
money they stole from tax payers
Money taken from people
Not really. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's.
that doesnt justify taxes and slavery
How is it slavery
You haven't established a premise as to how it's slavery.
if you dont understand basic economics im not sure we can have a discussion
Third time repeating this—If slaves could choose to work on plantations and if they did work got 6 figures I would unironically be pro-slavery
If you can't understand that what you're describing isn't even slavery, I'm not sure I even want to have a discussion.
My nigga I’m reading advanced economics
So you're aware, you need to be 13+ to use Discord.
Government is very inefficient with many things. The public and private mix that currently exists in the US is what drives up prices. Subsidized medicine with greedy individuals halts innovation and competition. The government should slowly begin to pull out of the sphere of healthcare and leave it to ambitious people to provide.
@ChillyWilly Or just make the whole thing public
Legalize Slavery
The US has a worse healthcare system than Saudi Arabia.
Well if everyone gets medical care, that'd include you as well. Hypothetically, let's say a rich person suddenly becomes poor. Well tough shit you can't get healthcare and thus die when you get a heart attache and can't afford to pay. As an example.
@Stahlgewittern Thank you for your wonderful contribution to this discussion
On the other hand, there is evidence that without an incentive, laborers work less as they aren't being rewarded for their labor. In terms of a nationalized medical system, one could assume that it'd be of poorer quality.
You aren’t entitled to the product of someone else’s labor
Who dictates what is theirs?
But in terms of medical aid, what would you gain other than material wealth? You aren't building something that will be used, or for self advancement or enjoyment. You're just caring for another person. Now one could say that their life could impact yours, perhaps they are a firefighter who was injured. By saving their life you might end up being rescued from a fire in your house later on. But what do you directly gain from enacting such care is the question..
It’s not doctors literally working for free @kwit_dat_Stalin @GreyWolf
That’s why it costs a lot of money to implement
You mean taxes
Yes money acquired from taxes
It costs the rich money
Cope
The worship of money is the root of all evil.
Who cares if it means taxes.
Well personally I think everyone deserves a chance for care(except those who commit bodily harm on purpose, or get hurt doing the same thing multiple times, because at that point you really should just stop doing whatever that thing is..). But I also think that every worker deserves fair reward for their labor.
Rewarding the worker for their effort is fine but rampant individualism is what got us into this mess in the first place.
Hmmmm
healthcare is a public service
or should be