Message from @Riley
Discord ID: 611317725276405801
That's why you have Meta-Physics.
Come on, its the dumbest view in the book, to rely exclusively on sensory perception. You know that this is erroneous. You cannot always trust your senses.
ok so light emitted from distant astronomical objects, such as galaxies, is shifted towards the red end of the electromagnetic spectrum, this is known as the doppler effect, and when applied to light, it is called redshift. The amount of redshift observed corresponds with the distant of said object, meaning that everything in the universe is moving away from eachother. They are moving at a rate of 71 km/s/mpc, and if you graph this, you find they must have all been "on top of eachother"
By the way my subject of expertise happens to be mathematics.
bam
big bang proved
well when you combine it with cosmic microwave backround radiation
I'm not sure if you're aware, but there's a lot of mainstream dissent on Darwinism by mathematicians.
buddy
did you just ignore what i said
i gave you scientific evidence for the big bang
<:groyper:515728068275601419>
Yes, I ignored it, because you do not understand how worldviews form. How you can have faulty presuppositions. And how ''facts'' are contingent upon those preconceived ideas. Thus, what you call a fact is in fact only an interpretation, for countless theories could be made to conform to such things.
so you don't think redshift is real
its just a libtarded lie
That's why I object to modern physics. Because it's constant speculation.
do you or do you not
think redshift is real
I think it's irrelevant to what you are saying.
its very relevant
it proves that everything is moving away from eachother, and therefore must have been closer
You didn't listen to a thing I just said.
Imagine your mind is like an operating system. Well, Addie, you were given a very faulty one. Sorry.
how old do you think the universe is?
Besides, how do you explain such things as information theory, where we have information coded within our DNA? @Riley
From everything we understand about information, it is impossible for this to originate without Mind.
wait answer my question first
how old do you think the universe is
No, because you are trying to build a strawman argument, even though I have not outwardly declared myself a creationist.
im not making an argument
im asking a question
I simply said that creationism is not how you perceive it. It's not a bunch of atheists and Protestants debating whether the world is 6000 years old.
It refers to the origin of man, which is 'creation ex nihilo'.
ok i got that
i already know
That is what makes Christianity distinct from say Platonism/Hinduism.
As Hinduism believes that the world is formed out of pre-existing matter.
can you demonstrate that a God created the universe or man?
Hence the doctrine of reincarnation of the transmigration of souls.
How can man create the universe?