but he also knows some history etc so its good channel

i slep

I'd like to see more history videos

history is very interest
i might study it one day but idk

I've always had a great interest in it

But I like this alt history

yeh if i ever studied it id have to tread very carefully

You'd get blacklisted

probably

but i got through sociology without getting found out so maybe i could pull it off

bruh
sociology class was the best
just 2 hrs of dunking on feminists and marxoids with tha bois

Based

I thought sociology was pozzed as fuck

Good video

it is pozzed but the people who take are half retarded most of the time and i was part of the minority ''right wing'' group

I've avoided taking sociology and psychology classes

are u at uni? @Shiba Inu

yes

I wish I wasn't tbh

College makes me depressed

i took psychology and sociology in high school lol

oh

I took psychology in high school as well

but it was worthless

teacher didnt really understand what he was talking about

my psychology teacher and sociology were both pretty based let us talk about iq, bell curve and evolutionary psych @Shiba Inu

my college is pretty pozzed

like most colleges

so i wouldn't find a teacher like that

Pozzed?

Gay

HIV positive

Ahhh

asha logos is pretty good, so is jive, however their indo euro origins stuff is a bit not accurate. However they are a decent source of getting into acnient and prehistory, I personally recommend genetics and reading authors that are a bit out of the mainstream for your given culture, but are considered authoritative nontheless (for ex. Gieysztor on slavs... Basically crushing anyone who went against him because of over 30 years of research)

What do you mean " a bit out of the mainstream for your given culture"

There are mainstream authors and theories for the given culture, so since I study slavs and IE, the mainstream theory is the kurgan hypothesis, and the yamnya urheimat hypothesis, which as it turns out has no evidence for it, rather Klysov explains in rather rdamning detail teh genetic connections and so far the annatolian hypothesis is supported by genetics, and linguistics.

The issue with the urheimat hypothesis is for example the issue of a lack of R1a, and R1b at the same time and an issue of no archeological links between CWC and Yamnya.

and as to the given culture, for slavs Gieysztor is a must read, if you want to know about slavic proto culture etc. and learn something about slavic mythology. The mainstream authors tend to really downplay ancient euro cultures to nothing more than actual barbarians, when the reality is in fact often quite the opposite, and these cultures were rather heavily developed prior to christianity. The advantage R1b peoples have is that christianity simply wrote more about them, left more artifacts untouched as often the priests were "local" coming from the local people. This however is an issue often for R1a people who saw priests coming from other regions and eradicating evidence of the prior religion and faith and certain cultural elements and instilling those foreign political narratives into their discription of these peoples.

(Then again I assume the same happened for some R1b peoples, I assume this happened to the celts for example)

That just confused me because I generally don't follow the mainstream opinion

And I'm not extremely interested in slavs at this current point in time

https://twitter.com/patrickporray/status/1173038147317297152?s=21

Why I am on gab despite being a leftist

It's so fucking dumb