Can you tell me why the blacks, in their own country of South africa, had to live in separate quarters?

because people that live around blacks dont like blacks because blacks are stupid and violent @n i g g a

Stupid and violent lmao. It's because at the time, they wanted to separate them from whites

the whites wanted to be seperate from the africans yes
because they were stupid and violent

why do countries with less blacks have more favourable attitudes towards blacks? @n i g g a

i would wager its because they dont know what theyre like firsthand

and buy into all of the pro black propaganda

Who

I do not condone or support pro black movements or eradication of white people. Just saying

the northern USA was whiter than the southern USA
the south was more racist because there were more blacks and they knew from experience that they were stupid and violent
south africa was more racist than england because they knew what blacks were like
even today Scotland is more supportive of immigration because they have less blacks than the southern english @n i g g a

The links are dead, will let you know when I find the source. But here is just an example of a black trader: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghezo

I do respect him for fighting the anglos though 😎

Oi! @Deleted User

anyway heres a good article if you wanna stop being bluepilled @n i g g a http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/slaves-in-america-wouldve-been-slaves-in-africa-anyway/

also a good article on jews https://web.archive.org/web/20190418094602/https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2018/04/24/the-jewish-question-an-empirical-examiniation/

there is also a video based on the article https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljMPafQpfDU

https://youtu.be/CMHQJ1Er8xA

So many NPCs in the video

They actually did it

Slavery in Africa was different than that in America, It was mostly do work to pay off something or to serve as a slave for a crime you committed,

lmao even if it was exactly the same

does that make it ok?

well no

if anything, the worst to be a slave in africa is in Dahomey
if they they didn’t to sell you, they’d just kill you

slaves in america had significantly better lives in terms of material conditions and they also didnt get castrated like many slaves that were sold to north africans
they also didnt really work any harder than most paid labourers at the time and they had better diets and when you factor in living expenses they were better off than most whites in america

Are we talking about slaves sold to north africans/arabs?
cause yeah they got it bad
But slaves in Sub Saharan Africa, except Dahomey were just made slaves to pay off something or doing time for a crime

If we’re talking about Captured slaves, they were put to work via agriculture, military etc

from 1500 to 1800, there were approximately 22 million slaves sold from Africa to the rest of the world, primarily the middle east and India.
Roughly 12.5 million slaves landed in the United States between 1525 and 1866
25 million African slaves were were sold to the rest of the world based on the annual rate of slaves sold from 1500 to 1800.

And so based on the size of the total African slave trade (Within-Africa, Atlantic, and Rest of World) from 1525 to 1866 was around 140.04 million. The Atlantic Slave Trade was 14.22 million, or about 10.15% of the total African slave trade at the time.

Wasn’t Alternative Hypothesis the guy who denied the Belgians did anything in the Congo

yes he made a video
and he didnt say that they didnt do anything
he said that the number was exaggerated and that it was often black officers that did the killing and that the presence of white supervisors led to less deaths @DoobyCooby

who is that guy? @Maksim is he some ukrainian nazbol?

^

Hello everyone.

Hello

German?

Hi

Jawohl

Gut

Was quite a debate at school, because of my views on gay people.