Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 624739367700660234
simmer down gypsy
>wikipedia
lol
@Deleted User has made my argument for me
he hasn't
because he didn't make any arguments
k
the end goal of marxism is a communist society?
marx was for the abolishment of the state, how does this translate to abolishing nation states? you didn't explain this
because nation states are states
monky
π π
define a nation state without using google
go
semantics
π π π
>spouts mindless platitudes
explain what you mean
>muh semantics muh semantics
i dont need to tbh
im asking you whether marxism has the goal of the communist society?
you do need to
A nation state is a country
A state is a governmental body
why do you conflate those two? Is it because of your ill intent or is it your own illiteracy?
a nation state is a state with a cultural/ ethnic consciousness
it is a state
no, a nation state is a a sovereign country united by cultural or racial commonalities, it has nothing to do with the functions of an actual state, nation-states existed WAY before the concept of a state was even materialized
you keep trying to make nation states seem what they're not to fit your agenda
why is that? are you jewish?
no thats a ''nation'' not a ''nation state''
nations have existed as long as people
nation states formed as a hierarchal offshoot
bro u just called me jewish im really triggered
a nation-state doesn't necessitate the functionalities of a state, why do you keep bringing this up? Marx was very pro national soverignty and I'd point you to his writings on the irish, poles and romanians for that if you don't believe me, why would this man hold contrary views ?
why is everybody willing to go to wikipedia to use as sources on ideologies in debates against their ideological enemy but donβt like it when someone does the same to theirs
why do you keep twisting words?
>higherarchical offshoot
what
why do you fall back on vacuous platitudes to explain your semantics argument which is clearly wrong
afraid to admit you're illiterate?
Like Bruh you canβt use wikipedia to define communism but then get mad when someone uses wikipedia to define your ideology
I don't even bother with that, it's too petty
no i said nation states not nations
you could argue for a form of stateless nationalism however since nationalism is
defined by its sovereignty it would be sort of stupid