they had a disadvantage from the start, you didnt

you had an advantage and you still lost

you lost to birds man

we lost to people

which one is worse l wonder

you lost to chinks, when everyone else was able to beat them

Russians, Americans, Australians all managed to beat them back but you

Our resources were thin in the war

YOU HAD NO SUPPLY ISSUE IN THE PACIFIC

l mean we literally fought in another world war prior to the second one

YOU LITERALLY JUST RECIVED REINFORCEMENTS AND SUPPLYS

were Americans and austrialians did not help by the way

Yes, and you sent nearly all of the australian and new zealand soldiers to there deaths due to bad military tactics

so yeah us losing is justified

Heard of Gallipoli?

We just send all the aussies to their deaths because we knew they were useless

you guys cant even kill birds

You literally lost the Turkish front because your leaders whole battle plan was "hurr durr send all our soliders onto beach with heavy defences it will be fine"

that wasn't our idea

it was the French

yes send perfectly find soldiers to there death and not using them in the war in a meaningful way

they said they would support us

It was a British general in charge

and we were told that were would be no opposition

it got leaked

We are talking about Gallipoli, not the french front

and thats why we fucked up

No opposition in a entirely enemy controlled country with nazi reinforcements?

So just pure retardation on the british then?

Not surprised

l will give you that one

but hey we won the war

so whats your point

yes so did we

My point is, you are useless and needed other countries to bail you out

there are still Emus in austrialia

so yeah

ya didnt win

There are still turks in turkey, still japs in the pacific, still Germans in germany

and you are currently beinig invaded by rapefugees

they surrendered