^

the british literally caused the conflicts in the Middle east by making countrys based on oil and money rather then ethnic groups and religion

except...
you havent established any causal relationship between british policy and the refugee crisis @Veraien

all you have said is that britain had a role in the existence of israel

And you said Israel is responsible for the refugee crisis

Had Israel never existed

Neither would the refugee crisis

British empire makes modern middle east and israel -> israel immediately starts operations to expand -> arabs hate jews already and view palestine as a islamic holy land, now in the hands of infidels and westerners -> arabs begin a campaign against israel -> israel wins 6 day war -> causing a long and destructive line of wars and conflict caused by israel and its european/american puppets

nuance and a knowledge of history are required

weve been in the middle east for oil and israel since the 80s and 90s

no the fact that israel exists had nothing to do with the crisis, operations by the us and israel caused the crisism it has literally nothing to do with britain

how did israel get formed

lmao
it was largely due to british policy

by the balfor declaration

which was written by the british

israel exists due to the british

right, so in your mind the american revolution caused the demographic displacement in the united states? @Veraien

and israel has conducted a campaign of war and conflict onto the middle east which is further elevated by the borders or country's also created by the british

yes

every event in history

has a reason for it

things do not spring from nothing

the easiest example is ww2

youre incapable of reasoning
in what way is the american revolution responsible for the browning of america?

ww2 happened because of the treaty of versatile crippled Germany, because they lost the war and the french wanted revenge for the war of 1871

thats historical determinism tbh

not really that sound

cause and effect my dude

lmao

you havent established a causal relationship
only correlation

when an event happens those events cause reactions which in turn cause other events to happen as a result

its not that hard of a concept to understand

its a common thing in history

events are decades in the making due to smaller events that take place

like wars

the causes for wars can span decades

not just in the build up period

your blatantly refusing to acknowledge your country's failings and errors

what you have established is a correlation between israel existing and israel conducting a certain amount of operations
there is no sound way that you can argue that britain is responsible for these operations

because the situation in the middle east would never have happened if the british did not support the forming of israel and honoured their pacts with their colonial holdings in the middle east

historical determinism[2]