the difference was, bismark was a military and diplomatic genius and hitler was a failed art student

bismark fucked up all of europe, but he wasnt stupid

his "reign of blood and iron" was followed by quick diplomatic capitalization on victory

hed stop just short of the capital, retreat, then say "we can destroy you any time we want, so, heres this guy we picked, hes your leader now"

imagine thinking that Hitler is dumb

the world wasn't ZOG then

hitler just copied bismark but without the brilliance

okay retard

You revive a people from the most degenerate shit into a world power while being dumb

when bismark was done germany had 100 years of prosperity and continental dominance

no

had until 1918

when hitler was done his women were selling themself to russians and americans for cigarettes and chocolate bars

1871-1918

you really cant argue with the fact that he failed

@VICTOR117 they has completely different tasks

not really

One was to create united germany

Hitler wasnt just trying to get their lost lands back

Hitler was trying to completely remove himself from jewish control

Bismark wasnt

the other was to resurrect Germany and destroy international financial judaism

did he succeed?

not when america and the entire world is against you

2nd one is almost impossible

and he still lasted a while

did

he

succeed

Hitler wanted to "destroy Jewish Bolshevism"

@Shalopy which was retarded

Yeah

the only way he was going to win was if the UK or america became Fascist

"I don't like Hitler because he lost"

they were both ZOG

^

im saying worshipping him as some uncriticizable god is a path to failure

he fucked up

i dont worship him

we'll learn from it