Message from @adolphus the sorrowful
Discord ID: 657734265097814016
they're not necessary at all
nature
fuck nature
Hypothetically if people who are free of gender roles defy the gender roles were they ever nature?
And if they're nature then why would removing them cause anything to change?
I'm not even arguing against you generally here but that was a stupid thing to say
speaking mad facts ^
ah so a bunch of nonsense and continuum fallacy
got it
also just because something is socially constructed doesnt imply invalidity
so no argument
@A Russian Bad Actor since when did you have to define my words
by nature i mean none imposing costs on others for your own interest
so you admit it's a social construct
yes so what>
it is
also I'm not a gender abolitionist just because it's a social construct dummy
not an argument
so youre against social constructs as a rule?
thats fucking retarded
yes
just when they're retarded and unnecessary
ie gender
so you admit that you pick and choose?
epic
yes cuz some social constructs are good
oh so its based on your subjective values lmao
epic
there are other methods of solving this problem but none that I agree with so
yes
i personally think that we should base constructs on their validity not on what i feel personally would be nice but thats just me and science
what lol
@adolphus the sorrowful I think you should kill yourself Dilbert
^tbh
took him 20 mins to say ''what''
just had to think on what you said
like what do you mean
gender abolitionism is a movement in science
It's not like my person ideas
nah you were typing for ages
so is/was lysenkoism
your point
no i was referring to the idea that it was retarded or unnecessary
those are your personal opinions
those say nothing about the validity of gender