And big ol boobies

@A Russian Bad Actor why

is having a penis a tactical advantage?

"why are the men who are less masculine the ones who don't like being expected to be masculine?"

tactical saga

I need serious answers

@Deli.v2 yes

No

If both members of the relationship have penises then there's twice as many men to defend their kid

Because it flops

And then

The issue becomes

How to have the kid

kidnapping

Out the butt

Tru

the good ol' Chinese way

kidnap the quietest kid on the playground

or the tallest

gender roles are stupid

just let people be people man

retarded take

how

they're not necessary at all

nature

fuck nature

Hypothetically if people who are free of gender roles defy the gender roles were they ever nature?

And if they're nature then why would removing them cause anything to change?

I'm not even arguing against you generally here but that was a stupid thing to say

speaking mad facts ^

ah so a bunch of nonsense and continuum fallacy

got it

also just because something is socially constructed doesnt imply invalidity

so no argument

@A Russian Bad Actor since when did you have to define my words

by nature i mean none imposing costs on others for your own interest

so you admit it's a social construct

yes so what>

it is

also I'm not a gender abolitionist just because it's a social construct dummy