Message from @Dorieus
Discord ID: 647936819748667404
babylon
the capital of southern
babylon is post sumer
Babylon? Yeah no. Akkadians took Sumer, and that's when they got the babylonian culture
they transfer ownership to uruk
and only because of this
it existed during sumerian times
does babylon and other states
ever get to come into being
but lived long after sumeria
as a mix between Semitic and Sumerian religion
Sumer*** @sky daddy
you say they arent related but
that isnt really
considerate of time
and how things moved within it
or through it
They're related in the sence that Akkadians took Sumer and started calling themselves Babylonians @Dorieus
well its completely off topic to bring up arratt when the original conversation was "zoojew, learn the difference between chaldea and babylon"
what does arratt have anything to do with that
no it doesnt
if aratta hadnt transfered ownership to uruk there would not be either
the difference between babylon and chaldea is assyrian conquer
nothing to do with arratt
if you say so >.>
ill go back to quiet
I hate to be this guy, but the Furry Sociopath is right
i didnt realize it was about right and wrong i just looked at the chat and thought i saw someone saying that
babylon was the first civilization
so i wanted to help
Wait
who said that?
Because that's straight up wrong.
like i said i will go back to quiet
Civilization wise, we can be sure the indus valley is older than Sumer which is older than Babylon
and Gobekli Tepe is older than the Indus Valley
no
This also doesn't factor in the Chinks
<a:dancingpenguin:634143824393928717>