Message from @Moxie

Discord ID: 247752915077300225


2016-11-14 15:58:52 UTC  

Whether or not your guy wins is besides the point.

2016-11-14 15:59:12 UTC  

When has a Third Party candidate actually win a election?

2016-11-14 15:59:22 UTC  

I mean, Moxie voted third party, obviously she (?) didn't *want* Trump or Clinton to win.

2016-11-14 15:59:29 UTC  

that doesnt matter the cubs never won the world series look at them now 😄

2016-11-14 15:59:34 UTC  

Whether you vote, vote 3rd party or abstain from voting it doesn't matter. The DNC candidate this time around were complete shit

2016-11-14 15:59:35 UTC  

Whether they win or not **isn't relevant**.

2016-11-14 15:59:50 UTC  

Yes, but that isn't my question.

2016-11-14 15:59:50 UTC  

Should've gone with Bernie, who people actually liked

2016-11-14 16:00:19 UTC  

bernie gave h9s deligates to clinton

2016-11-14 16:00:28 UTC  

i was making a similie

2016-11-14 16:00:32 UTC  

What was the last time that a 3rd party candidate actually won?

2016-11-14 16:00:36 UTC  

to show a similaritty

2016-11-14 16:00:39 UTC  

"Similie"?

2016-11-14 16:00:45 UTC  

In fact, the sole reason why third party never wins is because 80% of voters seem to have this dumb idea stuck inside their head that voting third party is pointless.

2016-11-14 16:01:01 UTC  

similarity like its raining cats and dog or do i have it confused with a metaphor

2016-11-14 16:01:02 UTC  

?

2016-11-14 16:01:15 UTC  

No, your English is just confusing

2016-11-14 16:01:21 UTC  

:<

2016-11-14 16:01:28 UTC  

The last time a third party candidate won was aeons ago.

2016-11-14 16:01:34 UTC  

Back when the republicans were still third party.

2016-11-14 16:01:37 UTC  

true @Manock

2016-11-14 16:03:15 UTC  

just bc third party hasnt won doesnst mean its impossible for them to win ,if everyone keeps the mindset of "oh third party will never win i guess i have to choose the bigger number" is a stupid thought process when in actuallity there is a chance for 3rd party to win

2016-11-14 16:03:19 UTC  

its a possibility

2016-11-14 16:03:31 UTC  

Back when that parties were just one party called the Democratic - Republican Party?

2016-11-14 16:07:25 UTC  

No, third parties have no chance. At all. Under the American first past the post system. They'll never get enough votes to win and just ensure the opposite major party wins.

2016-11-14 16:07:39 UTC  

For third parties to have a fair shot you need a single transferable vote system

2016-11-14 16:07:46 UTC  

Unless people stop being dumb but I guess that's kinda asking for too much.

2016-11-14 16:07:53 UTC  

That gives you a secondary candidate your vote goes to if your first choice loses.

2016-11-14 16:08:03 UTC  

That ensures that the opposite candidate won't gain from your vote.

2016-11-14 16:08:09 UTC  

most of the country is dumb ppl

2016-11-14 16:08:21 UTC  

But the whole "opposite candidate gains from your vote" is bull. That's not how voting works.

2016-11-14 16:08:32 UTC  

It's too much to hope for to hope people won't be ignorant morons.

2016-11-14 16:08:40 UTC  

First of all, when you vote Stein, who is even the "opposite candidate"?

2016-11-14 16:08:58 UTC  

Unless you can actually educate people properly, stupidity will always be around

2016-11-14 16:09:37 UTC  

_cough_

2016-11-14 16:09:39 UTC  

California

2016-11-14 16:09:41 UTC  

_COUGH_

2016-11-14 16:09:47 UTC  

it depends on how there raised too and family and all that other shit most people give into society and social norms

2016-11-14 16:10:16 UTC  

Not to mention that if Sargon is correct, people have actually actively been conditioned to be obsessed with social justice.

2016-11-14 16:10:19 UTC  

I think you need to watch this voting series that explains, in detail why third parties can't work in our system:
http://www.cgpgrey.com/politics-in-the-animal-kingdom/

2016-11-14 16:10:21 UTC  

the gov dooesnt like people thinking outside the box