Some like to be the head of the pack, but still create a belief system that is rigid and dogmatic.

Or, their experiences they have themselves are simply being warped to fit a predefined set of dogma.

If there was a way to get rid of the Tribalistic behavior, we could put an end to lots of things

We see that all the time with SJWs distorting events to suit their narrative.

but in Evolution, we had the behavior hardwired into our consciousness

Like calling something harassment when someone simply criticized an opinion they had.

Exactly

or someone defending something that has flaws and they don't admit it when it's pointed out

The tribalistic behaviour, to its credit, is why we've even survived as a species. Looking to one pack leader that you follow makes the ability to direct people around very convenient.

Pointing out real flaws is considered a threat to them. that makes them very hostile.

exactly

I don't defend games or anything blindly

I admit it has flaws

And I just say I like the game even though the flaws are existiant

and I just respect their opinion

I only get mad when someone says I can't hold that opinion or they try anything to convince me my opinion is wrong

Also... one thing you see is very common in these kinds of people is that their concept of theory of mind is extremely underdeveloped, if not outright broken.
Theory of mind is your ability to recognized that your own thoughts and perceptions of the world are unique to you and that other people have their own unique perception and will not necessarily think and observe what you do.
People with tribalistic behavior generally cannot excersize this ability as well as other people can and often are unable to comprehend that there are other points of view than their own.

This is why you see, for instance, SJWs accusing people of doing exactly what they are actually doing. Because in their perspective, the way they think and the things they know are the only possible ways to do so, so when they look at the *opposing side* they form a conclusion on what they are doing based on what they would do themselves with that information, just with the details swapped because it's the opposing side. They do this because they can't comprehend that there are other points of view and other lines of thought.

Yes

That's why their myth about the patrairchy is exactly what they're doing themselves. That's why their narrative on rape culture (which to them is rape of women only) is actually exactly what they think about the rape of men.

Because it's exactly what they would do, therefore it must be exactly what anyone else would do because there is no other way of thinking as far as they're concerned.

Games can suck because of developers having bad ideas.

or Fans having many ideas developers can't all implement

or both

The bigger problem can be that developers arent able to let go of bad ideas and start from scratch.

that 2

There's many factors to why people can like or hate a game

but some people always like to have it split between the "Your either with us or against us"

That kind of Mentality causes people to hate any game no matter what good qualities it has

it's Tribalistic

and I've seen this increase a lot this year

I bet theres people who will hate my current game project because its not like "COD".

or something they personally want isn't in it

or something that they don't like is in it but someone else likes it

like how Dead Rising took out the time limit

people like it, people don't like it

both bring up good points, but I personally want to explore the map and not worry about getting a bad ending

though, there is sadly only 1 ending, and Capcom is making Overtime a DLC

which is a bad idea

It's why I avoid a lot of gaming communities. Inevitablly you have a lot of the crazies ruining the fun.

I'm so casual of a gamer I probably piss a bunch of hardcore gamers off 😛

IE: Playing Witcher 3 at the lowest difficulty and only really caring about the story.