Message from @The Big Oof
Discord ID: 540594917559500801
Getting mad is often the result of the other person's stupidity.
Or one's own
I have made my point, you have yet to give a counter argument
Give me a counter argument, I will restate it again
I have, I told you the defintion
you just tried to make a dishonest interpretation
which failed badly
But anyways, socialism wants the market forces to be abolished. To do this the state intervenes in the market.
If it failed badly, you would have no problem explaining why it's wrong.
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ OY
MORON
STOP MAKING LIBERTARIANS LOOK BAD.
Because the defintion said government or collective ownership
JESUS. STOP BEING RETARDED. NOT EVERYTHING YOU DON'T LIKE IS SOCIALISM.
it's the consensus of most here that you look like a dumbass
I never said that
lolol
yes you did
Please remove Trump the Commie from your profile picture. @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Most in a server of edgy socialists
🤔
Corporatism is not socialism.
Dude I don't care what randoms here say but the point is any market intervention is socialist
A capitalist economy is a free market with 0 state intervention
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ let's debate our definitions
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ You are a commie because you live in a governed country.
Socialism relies on social ownership, right? hence the meaning of the word
Social ownership as in workers owning the mop?
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ Social ownership means it is owned or controlled by the collective
Not really no
it can be state aswell
Stop thinking
State ownership is not the same as collective ownership
What
lol
....
No. Socialism means that the state regulates and owns the means of production. The state does not own the means of production anywhere outside of maybe North Korea. Hell, even "socialist" countries aren't socialist because in almost every case they don't own the means of production. When we say socialism we invariably mean "attempted socialism" (socialism in reality is actually not even possible to achieve in any large group; it goes directly against human nature).
I never said the economy was socialist
wut
I said the market intervention was a socialist policy
which is the case
...no.