I see no difference.

What socialists don’t want to abolish the market ?

Or restrict it

Market socialists....

Define market socialist

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism

It's...it's not that hard to understand

it's literally in the name

Which also includes restricting the market forces

Does not follow.

Yes it does.

"The market isn't free"

"Therefore, interventionism is socialism"

This is a fallacy

Nope it’s just socialism has its goals to abolish the market

Or restrict it

If x group advocates for y, then z is a policy of x

Hence any interventionism is socialist

`If x group advocates for y, then z is a policy of x
`

Is what you're saying

Are there any capitalists in the world except ancaps?

That doesn’t make any sense

Well no

Exactly, it doesn't make sense

@Kazimir Malevich

No your example doesn’t

It doesn’t make sense literally

My point is socialism actively tried to restrict and/or abolish the market

You're really stretching it with your definitions. You're taking the broadest definition of socialism possible, and then using it in defense of the strictest definition of capitalism possible.

Also

another note

By using interventionist methods

"mixed economy" doesn't mean mixed between capitalism and socialism

Who are the people who call themselves capitalists but are not ancaps?

You dont know what the term means

I’ve used the same definition width for both

Although it can refer to this

typically when viewing it in the context of the United States

Mixed economies are socialist and capitalism elements mixed in

it means

mixed between a command economy and a market economy

@Kazimir Malevich is North Korea a democratic republic

Not...all....socialists....want...a...command...economy <:brainlet:508484031625691156>