You just dismissed by argument over an age

"You're 16, so I'm done with this conversation"

"You're 16, therefoe you're wrong"

Arguing definitions in 2019

two different things

They are completely different claoims

I didn't say you were wrong because you're 16

Those are essentially the same

You inferred it

I said I'm not arguing with you because you're young and think you know everything

Hence why you dismissed the argument

That reflects nothing about the validity of your argument

it speaks to you as a person

Ad hominem is when you use a personal attack as an argument

Ure 16 now stfu kid

No, I argued like this when I was a kid, but not with the same position

Everyone thinks they know everything at that age.

That was a personal attack over an age to dismiss the argument

Stalin is a fag

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Quote me where I said you're wrong because you're 16

Clearly it seems so, I know about economic theory more than you

I will literally make you owner of this server

You don't.

You're just young and think you know more than you actually do.

You inferred it

Dismissing argument over an age

"You inferred it"

No I do know more then you

first of all

It's implied

second of all

It can be inferred

you're wrong

What has been my main criticism of you this entire conversation?

Dude you call@me out for making statements with explanations but do the exact same

What has been my main criticism of you this entire conversation?

I will repost this until we get this clear

>argues definitions
>thinks he knows more
>screams ad hom

wdym

What has been my main criticism of you this entire conversation?

That you argue disingenuously.

You're not here to have an honest debate