Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 540902459808284692
Broadest meaning possible to defend the strict meaning possible?
Yes
Makes no sense
Broadest meaning of socialism to defend the narrowest meaning of capitalism
There we go
No, you're just a retard, but I'll explain anyway, which is something you'll never do with your claims despite insisting you do.
The broadest meaning in this case is referring to this silly definition of socialism, and the strictest definition is referring to your personal definition of capitalism.
"Socialism is when the government does stuff, therefore, any intervention is not capitalism"
But I didn’t use the broadest or strictest
The width of the definitions were the same
Explain how they are the same.
Socialism is when the state or workers own the mOp
Capitalism is the free market
This is historically false
nope
name the socialist
It’s true
It's factually incorrect
This isn't debatable
You are denying history at this point.
APPEAL 👏 TO 👏 DEFINITION
Name
the socialist
Fallacy fallacy
who said
I explained how it is a fallacy
In this instance, it is
Throwing the word fallacy everywhere doesn’t dismiss my argument
Exactly, which is why I'm not simply throwing it around, I'm explaining to you why it has application here
No you haven’t
How old are you?
Just a question
16
Makes sense
I'm done with this conversation now
Another fallacy I see
Ad hominem
It wasn't an argument
That's not how ad hominem works
It clearly was