i say that the blood of a people and their ideas are an expression of their own people

as the old saying goes, german engineering, roman statecraft, and greek philosophy

Greek gayology

I always advocate that race-keeping should not ever be considered a top priority within a nation. Advocating for the fact that what unites a nation is it's common ethnicity is dangerous in many ways. I have no problem with promotion of a pure ethnic people within a state, but when your race becomes your focus, your God above anything else will become your race, then things will go bad.

i say that spirituality should be transferrable to the material
all components are important

Compare Mussolini and Hitler: Mussolini's fascism didn't care about race in his empire, he rather focuses on the patriotic uniting under the Empire, of all people surrounding the Mediterranean. Hitler on the other hand, argued that other races shouldn't unite under his empire, but they ought to be moved away and eradicated for their "Living Space".

I can get behind Mussolini's idea in that sense, but not Hitler's, never.

That's not to say that Mussolini wasn't a racist, but heck, who weren't racist before the 60s?

mussolini still expelled lecherous people, like the gypsies
hitler might've been too focused on aryanism, but he was right about the jews etc

I think ideas are creations of a people yes, but that the bloodline is the top priority of the state

In your opinion, that is, @Bee

which part

The state should have the best interests of say, Anglo-Saxons in mind and not capitalism's best interests

Second part, 'course.

@David V there was a racial position in the Italian state, even before contact with Hitler. But it was more of a promotion of local people's culture and race. The empire gave surprising autonomy to it's colonies.

that isn't really opinion lol

@King Leopold II Yeah that's what I said, wasn't it?

No

You said patriotism of Italy

He promoted local people in Somalia to maintain Somalian culture

The only people non Italian he tried to do civnat shit with was the Libyans whom he considered "Muslim Italians"

i think that its important to have both a racial and spiritual worldview
peoples should have autonomy, yet united

You know whatt, you're right, but the Somalians could still be fascists.

sure. in their countries

They were, and I know a few who still are.

But the point was he didn't want them to consider theirselves italian, Somalia was an Italian Protectorate with a lot of autonomy.

@King Leopold II We agree, just not on phrasing it.

Every race has the right to exist if they have the will to fight for it and perservere. A natural state is our differences, not an amalgation to one.

GUESS HOWS BACK

Howdy

The true heir to the Mexican throne.

oh first of all

I’m not wild

Second

@King Leopold II you are correct

If Mexico had another civil war that was total in scale and actually wasn't just a transfer of power but a complete ideological victory things would actually be better

Lmao

i.e genocide of ghetto degenerates

I already had one