i find anarchists' views on economics interesting
i have sympathy for it, but at this point in global history, we are not ready for it, but we can try to at least move in the right direction
i am against neoliberalist capitalism/neoconism etc

i think most of my beef with anarchists are their retarded views on social issues/values/freedoms

anarchists are just mere pawns now for neoliberal globalist corporations nowadays

bUt tHAT wOUlD vIOlATe mY N.A.P

Maybe you've never understood what anarchists wanted to replace the state with. In an anarchist country or a nation, true sovereignty will be in the hands of the people. And the people will be organised through a system if federation that is bottom up. That means workers, united in their trades and jobs as association of workers, those associations federating together to form a commune. All associations are the supreme sovereigns. They appoint committees and councils for the administration of a territorial branch and they can kick them out whenever necessary if they slack off in their work. A commune in a given region will federate to form a regional federation represented in a regional committee of the regional federation. The committee itself will be formed from delegates of different communes. The federation is important for the coordination od economic and cultural projects in a large area, particularly in a region. Now, those delegates are nothing like the representative politicians like we have today, on the contrary, they're nothing short of messengers that corresponds with the regional committee while having no power of his own, true power will lie in the individual communes, and in turn in the associations of workingmen. After the regional federation, comes the national federation. The national federation is a union of all regional federation of a given nation, represented by a national committee. The rules for the delegates is the same as the delegates for regional federation. Again, the national federation is important for coordination for economic and cultural projects composing a whole nation and for communication. The federations (local, regional and national etc) are also important for a common registry of data and statistics for production and consumption so that the economy goes through an orderly and efficient manner.

@Pulse Redux we're having a serious conversation. Please don't pollute.

All right, all right, don't call the Mc Airforce on me

@انتقام i agree with what you're saying for the most part
i think we should have that except have a state with that for today
mabe in the future where capitalism/financial international capitalists are eradicated and there are no wars, we can have that
but for right now, we can't do it
i do agree we should do alot more for the workers etc

also to add that anarchists today don't even fight for that anymore lol

And as for self defense, anarchists have never rejected the prospect for a well disciplined army. Alexander Berkman, after the Russian Revolution had emphasized, "The social revolution demands that we build a well disciplined and organised army for it's defense." And anarchists historically have followed this. Whether it be Durruti's Iron Coloumn, or the Revolutionary Army Of Ukraine, they've maintained a strictly disciplined and organised armed force to fend off the enemy. But in this day of age, no matter how big and well disciplined your army is, against the superior imperialist armies like that of the US and China, will fall like a house of cards because of their drone and missile technology. So the very conduct of war has to be revisited by revolutionaries. In the meantime, there's no alternative other thsn guerilla warfare.

Anarchism is gay

sure i agree
though today, all that anarchists for are fighting for are cummies and opening borders to third worlders lol

at least euro/american ones

No if it's it the triumph of the revolution you want and the moral and material development of the workers, you will have to do away with the government. We've seen time and time again how the organised parasites like the Bolsheviks and communists have destroyed all prospects of the revolution and destroyed organs of workers control thus inevitably destroying the morale of the revolution and reduce the workers to a cattle of herds and slaves for the service and interest of the members of a party dictatorship.

i partially agree, though bolsheviks are a whole monster of their own,
they are internationalists, we are just mere meatbag workers for them
i agree moreso with nationalist communists like dimitrov, tito, etc

there has to be both a spiritual and material aspect to revolution

The revolution can never triumph without its spiritual and moral elevation

i would back anarchists more if they attacked more banks and elites etc
right

They are

anarchism has been hijacked

Yes by the ancaps

nah not them lol

Most right-libertarian theorists are jews

i know that lol

but yes
its part of the kosher sandwich

Anarchism is not a party organ. It is an idea, it can't be hijacked. Even it did, the degenerative ones will be rejected for the slow but inevitable development of the revolutionary one. Like how after a body has been wounded, it slowly pushes the foreign objects outward and starts healing in the process.

so would you purge furrykin trannies fighting for their cummies lol

social liberals ruined anarchism imo

Cummies meaning?

sadly communism is popular in my country

orgasms, perversions
so called "sexual freedom" and other degenerates

I see. It's not a question of whether they should or not be purged. If they are at the vanguard of the anarchist struggle then it's our fault, us revolutionaries that didn't work hard enough to reach to the masses and in turn let them be at the forefront. The issue now isn't whether we should purge them (even if so, we wouldn't do it because we're not the party 'leader' of the anarchist party) the issue right now is how hard we can agitate and spread our propaganda among the masses for them to accept our revolutionary programme and forget the furries.

hmm
yeah it would help if you don't isolate/alienate the people you want to spread your propaganda to
which would mean no more anti-white rhetoric, no more pushing freaks to the front of the movement etc
i always say in order to break people's mass psychosis when it comes to the system, is to disrupt people's lifestyles'/standard of living, which means that the system has to collapse
i'm somewhat of an accelerationist, but it has to be done in a certain way
discredit/destroy trust in institutions such as the media, economic institutions, government etc

Majority of the workers in the West are white. Anti-white is synonymous for anti-workers

glad you agree
wish that other leftists got that memo

but that is part of the hijacking which has happened

Im not against accelerationism But I don't personally think it will inevitably lead to the collapse of bourgouis order. The powers that be will probably fall behind the reactionaries and fascists who will promise to restore their power once they're in control. Just like what happened in Spain and Germany. So instead of agitating for collapse, we should agitate for social revolution (which is also the collapse of the olfd order but also the preparation for the new one)

yes, social revolution is a part of it
although i'd say that the international bourgeois also agitate fascist states (which i do agree have somewhat of a class of bougies, you can call them local/national bougies, but are mostly on a leash and are subject to the state and the people) to collapse them and revert back to international financial/corporate control
but yes, i agree that making deals with international bourgeois is a good way to get fucked in the end

and there is also a possible risk of a "back door" to revert back to unrestrained capitalism

Yes

i have rather complex views when it comes to this, but i think that the corporative/corporatist state (not corporatocracy or oligarchy), can be a starting/transitioning point to a economic system where continental federations will form, esp with technology, kind of like the holy roman empire, and other continental regions in other parts of the earth form and we exchange goods etc and will possibly bring some type of a post scarcity anti capitalist order