Message from @crud

Discord ID: 298264471846256652


2017-04-03 01:13:52 UTC  

that's a very broad statement

2017-04-03 01:14:09 UTC  

as are your views, vik

2017-04-03 01:14:14 UTC  

last time i checked, if you drop an apple it still hits the ground

2017-04-03 01:14:26 UTC  

let me know how that's relevant

2017-04-03 01:14:28 UTC  

take your time

2017-04-03 01:14:42 UTC  

I learned recently that I don't have a lazy eye. But a rare condition called HyperEso Deviation. I went to the eye doctor last year, and heard nothing of the sort. But after a year and a half or so, they discovered this new condition, apparently.

2017-04-03 01:15:14 UTC  

the difference being is that my views apply to a broad set of things, wheras yours do not. information chagnes, not very often, but it may. God does not.

2017-04-03 01:15:28 UTC  

Things are always changing. That's a fact. If enough people race-mix, the genes will eventually evolve to handle that.

2017-04-03 01:15:32 UTC  

if you have you ever tried to write a research paper on anything or know anything about how medical journal articles are publishes you'll know that old information

2017-04-03 01:15:40 UTC  

just like you have, right?

2017-04-03 01:15:40 UTC  

@Spirit so a government study isn't a valid source, but Dailymail is?

2017-04-03 01:15:43 UTC  

ESPECIALLY information that is 20+ years old at this point

2017-04-03 01:15:52 UTC  

KEK

2017-04-03 01:15:55 UTC  

is outdated

2017-04-03 01:16:00 UTC  

I gotta give that to Spad tbh

2017-04-03 01:16:11 UTC  

Good one

2017-04-03 01:16:15 UTC  

I just was trying to find multiple articles to prove my point

2017-04-03 01:16:17 UTC  

depends on what kind of information

2017-04-03 01:16:31 UTC  

the article is more than likely a summary of a published journal

2017-04-03 01:16:31 UTC  

The Dailymail article doesn't list any sources, so it's not like I can check out if anything they say is valid

2017-04-03 01:16:36 UTC  

it is from us nih yes?

2017-04-03 01:16:43 UTC  

"The study is published in the journal Nature and was funded by the Medical Research Council. "

2017-04-03 01:16:48 UTC  

derp

2017-04-03 01:16:54 UTC  

i know this guy who is like mostly white but part korean, and he pretends as if he's some sort of korean imperialist or something. ethnic politics and stuff. he's completely off his rocker. i tried to explain to him that koreans don't see him and think "ah a fellow korean" and when i tell him he's more or less white he gets angry at me

2017-04-03 01:16:58 UTC  

This isn't something that is irrelevant, it's something that is commonly known

2017-04-03 01:17:16 UTC  

There is nothing wrong with being mixed race

2017-04-03 01:17:19 UTC  

in the war of ideas, evidence is secondary, truth is first.

2017-04-03 01:17:25 UTC  

no, nothing inherently wrong with it

2017-04-03 01:17:32 UTC  

@Vik it is no ones job to tell mixed people who they should identify as

2017-04-03 01:17:40 UTC  

Fucking kek

2017-04-03 01:17:48 UTC  

no, you don't understand, this guy, you can't see any asian in him

2017-04-03 01:17:58 UTC  

it's for his sake I'm telling him to not try and integrate into an ethnic group he is not part of

2017-04-03 01:17:58 UTC  

And why would you need to identify with one thing?

2017-04-03 01:18:04 UTC  

Their majority of their ethnicity tells them who they should identify as, tbh

2017-04-03 01:18:33 UTC  

Like, I'm white as snow. But somewhere in there, I have Native American blood.

2017-04-03 01:18:36 UTC  

but you shouldnt try to erase his background

2017-04-03 01:18:42 UTC  

Why do you even need to identify with a race? A race should not define you as a person, your personality should

2017-04-03 01:18:47 UTC  

^

2017-04-03 01:18:48 UTC  

his background is that his dad had yello fever

2017-04-03 01:18:58 UTC  

why do you people want to separate so much