And this is from a period of time with much less racial tension in the US

a lot of those sources in that paper

guess what

over 20 years old

why don't you post something that's more recent instead?

I wish there was more representation of mixed couples and children who neither are part white

information changes and we learn more about ourselves as time passes

welcome to reality

I can't because it's racist to study race

that's a very broad statement

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html

as are your views, vik

last time i checked, if you drop an apple it still hits the ground

let me know how that's relevant

take your time

I learned recently that I don't have a lazy eye. But a rare condition called HyperEso Deviation. I went to the eye doctor last year, and heard nothing of the sort. But after a year and a half or so, they discovered this new condition, apparently.

the difference being is that my views apply to a broad set of things, wheras yours do not. information chagnes, not very often, but it may. God does not.

Things are always changing. That's a fact. If enough people race-mix, the genes will eventually evolve to handle that.

if you have you ever tried to write a research paper on anything or know anything about how medical journal articles are publishes you'll know that old information

just like you have, right?

@Spirit so a government study isn't a valid source, but Dailymail is?

ESPECIALLY information that is 20+ years old at this point

KEK

is outdated

I gotta give that to Spad tbh

Good one

I just was trying to find multiple articles to prove my point

depends on what kind of information

the article is more than likely a summary of a published journal

The Dailymail article doesn't list any sources, so it's not like I can check out if anything they say is valid

it is from us nih yes?

"The study is published in the journal Nature and was funded by the Medical Research Council. "

derp

i know this guy who is like mostly white but part korean, and he pretends as if he's some sort of korean imperialist or something. ethnic politics and stuff. he's completely off his rocker. i tried to explain to him that koreans don't see him and think "ah a fellow korean" and when i tell him he's more or less white he gets angry at me

This isn't something that is irrelevant, it's something that is commonly known

There is nothing wrong with being mixed race

in the war of ideas, evidence is secondary, truth is first.

no, nothing inherently wrong with it

@Vik it is no ones job to tell mixed people who they should identify as

Fucking kek

no, you don't understand, this guy, you can't see any asian in him