even global warming

but scientists cannot admit "we don't know"

at least not to politicians

Ye, I personally can't understand why the scientists lie to me, when I clearly see that it's cold outside.

and then they'll say "we don't know" on obvious subjects like racial differences

Well we do know that more CO2 = higher air temp

yes

doesn't prove CO2 caused it

Well we can map its proportionality

Yesterday I froze my bollocks off and you're telling me some "science" will disprove that?

we're assuming climate is periodic right

with a standard deviation

Weather is day to day, climate is an average

But yes

I think the largest issue here is making studies palatable for normies

and normies can't do stats

I don't fucking care what a scientist says I care about the standard deviation/avg/confidence intervals on the data

If there were to be global warming, you wouldn't be able to use the penguin profile pic, since they'd go extint.

>I'm pro carbon-emissions

that's where you're wrong bucko

I'm just saying I haven't seen much proof that climate change is man-made

not that I support the use of fossil fuels

It's overhyped to a certain extent

Just look at the proportion of molecule concentration to rise in temperature

I still think industrial interaction with natural habitats has been a disaster

I'm just saying I'm not sold yet on the CO2 caused global warming shit

The models aren't perfect, but it's probably a descent start

I've seen it

I'm just saying we should probably be more sure before we start terraforming Earth's climate

which is what these people want to do

alternatively they want to neuter the west industrially

which is not the answer

The issue primarily is that every "solution" for CO2 emissions is fucking retarded and also we haven't proven yet that it's the culprit

The west is not the main culprit anymore

Just like overpopulation

all the solutions are fucking retarded

and when you look at it these "solutions" are not efficient but rather politically palatable

the "solution" to overpopulation is somehow not rejecting latin america/africa/india attempts to offload their overpopulation on us

but rather just europeans having less babies

Environmentalists used to be anti-immigration since they realized it would just increase overpopulation/impact on natural habitats more

What you have to realize is that the majority of science today is what is politically expedient especially if politicians talk about it