No violence.

Nothing.

The descriptions of how well a cock fits into a vagina and therefore is not considered rape.

that would be a qualifier

So let me get this straight, you read the first line and just got rid of it.

I read far enough to determine it was not within Discord’s guidelines. If it had not, I would have read the entire thing and done nothing.

>I would have read the entire thing and done nothing.

Yup.

So if you read the whole thing you would have left it alone?

What?

No. If I had read the entire thing without finding anything violating ToS

So you Shoa'ed my image because it wasn't between the guidelines?

Once I found a ToS violation there was no need for me to read further.

What violation is this?

@Shgingles. yes, so discord won’t shoa *us*

No naughty examples?

Jesus you're really fearful.

Already told you.

Give me one sec.

Do not repost it or you *will* be muted.

I'm still lost.

You deleted a image with a few innuendos and you saw that violated a non-existent rule.

An existent rule.

Which rule?

Give me it verbatim.

Source and all.

Check the guidelines. Posting NSFW shit in a non-NSFW designated channel means that this channel becomes improperly labeled, which means the server is in violation. We can’t have that.

But it wasn't NSFW.

Also...

Also...

>9. BY USING THIS SERVER, YOU ARE CONFIRMING YOU ARE AT LEAST 14 YEARS OF AGE

I determined it qualified as NSFW.

>Saying no 14 year old has heard the word penis or vagina.

Why though?

It didn't have any nudity or violence.

Lewdness and graphic descriptions m8

>Graphic descriptions

Thats a real god scape goat.