Actually it was a pair of twins

ofc hes going to be confused

Women are more empathetic than men, because they evolved to better empathize with children

hence why crossdressing would be outlawed in any healthy society

They also have different mating strategies

thats a pseudo-scientific claim

No it is not.

it’s not pseudoscientific

the overwhelming academic consensus is that these roles are socially constructed

psychology is literally a pseudo-science

homosexuals are also more prone to mental disorders, even when controlled for societal ostracization

The child in question never identified as Female even if he was forced to do Feminine things since he was a young child

homosexuality is a disorder in and of itself

no, society and psychology are fiercely tied

no they are not

Cultural consensus often dictates scientific consensus. It's why appeal to authority is a fallacy.

That being said, I'm not saying i know more than these people @neztharion

Hey know don't disrespect my man CG Jung

well we live in a shitty unhealthy society

We once believed homosexuality was a mental illness

for cultural reasons

homosexuality is a mental illness

it is a mental illness

Was the consensus then correct?

it was indeed correct

By your own logic, surely it was

considering homosexuality has been present in not just human beings but in different species how is it a mental illness exactly?

okay, but once we throw the evidence and data we have out of the window we're lost to baseless speculation

which is useless

not only that but its present in multiple societies like japan, Greece, rome, etc

that's a myth lol

@Orwell if cancer is present in sharks and other animals besides humans does that mean it is not a disease?

@neztharion I did not say through evidence or data out the window. Never once did I say that.

socially accepted in those societies too

greece banned faggotry

i don't understand the analogy

and it happened rarely amongst the upper class of rome

it means it is naturally occurring phenomenon

@neztharion Read my claim again. My claim was arguing against using consensus alone as your metric

*argument

w/e

Being “naturally occurring” does not mean something is good