i'm not saying it's a social construct

@neztharion How has it been disproven? Most of the arguments (that I have seen at least) usually boil down to using the existence of grey areas and the transgendered as proof alone that gender is purely social.

Some aspects of gender are indeed social constructs, for instance, "masculine and feminine" colors, but the personality traits associated with them, however, are not

i'm saying it's not a social construct

@neztharion you're the only one of us two that sucks up to the regime

that's when you begin mixing sex and gender

they mean the same thing

well, they dont

yes they do

in the overwhelming majority of people

gender and sex are the same thing

literally semantics

transgenders are a tiny minority

trannies are a mental illness along with homosexuality

@neztharion if gender roles are socially constructed why are gender disparities more pronounced in Scandinavian countries than in America

So, and ironically taking an arguement from (((Jorden Peterstien))) howcome even in extremely liberal societies, where that "gender" gap is effectively completely removed from society, you still see typical gender roles play out at higher-then-wanted levels by shitlib bolsheveks

@neztharion Also

hormones influence personality traits

hormones vary between the sexes

This is something I'm sure you accept

If material conditions can change cultural values towards gender roles why can't material conditions genetically select for different traits in men and women? This is autistic.

caved in head congnitive dissoance is my diagnosis

We can even see this in women with high testosterone

pretty standard tbh

Women who have more of it are more masculine than other women

and vice versa for men who have less of it

im here

And, what influences these factors? 🤔

reading yp

Feminists want to lay eggs in your eyelids.

Guys guys, @neztharion is a contrarian, he's only here to disagree with you, it's low quality bait

i mean he is a fucking retard

I'll take the bait hook line and sinker, its fun

because Scandinavian countries are more economically developed with much higher financial security, so women are less likely to seek out fields like stem as they do in america. they're basically more prone to social norms

...but

Wouldnt a country with lesser economic development mean there are less opportunities for women?

also

yes, if we look at those countries women fall back into gender roles

those are the roles they would normally go to

when they have more resources

like you just said

Are you saying that because women have less financial pressure they choose jobs they want, i.e., nursing and teaching? Are you seriously making my argument for me?