Message from @Apollo, Plague Lord
Discord ID: 401188849692180481
That's an abnormality
isn't reality what the collective opinion is
Who gives a
idk
If I talked a lot >self-describing myself as talkative wouldn't be a stupid thing to say
This debate is too woke for me
as long as thats what you and others percieve with their senses then sure
yupyup
Cool, talkative is subjective too
The ol “nothing that exists outside of senses is objective” debate?
@Deleted User No, Archaic thinks intelligence is objective
There's nothing wrong with describing yourself as intelligent so long as you are being realistic
Never said that
Yes it is
If you can measure it
You can't measure intelligence
what would be a reason someone would say somebody is not talkative if they are in fact talking a lot?
You can't measure something that's subjective
Yes you can
IQ tests would disagreee with you
Mensa is terrible
first of all
second
Of course I'm talking about just one type of intelligence
IQ measures cognitive ability
I don't think IQ is a measure of intelligence but a measure of the ability of logical reasoning and level of perception
If you have someone who’s functionally retarded and a genius, and you time how long they take to do a test.. and one scores higher than the other and the questions of the test are design to examine recall memory and problem solving etc
which in itself is pretty loose
Than you can say intelligence is measurable
there is multiple types of intelligence
that IQ can't measure
Already said that @Paul-
oh i happened to miss that in the list, my bad
But I'm just using that as an example because it is easy to demonstrate
If someone has better cognitive ability, then they are more likely to be intelligent
if Inteligence is analytical ability of your mind then IQ measures it with high probability
But intelligence is subjective
depends
I always scored in the top 1% of my OLSAT which specifically measures logic/deduction skills
Cognitive ability is objective but it's loose