Message from @_xParadoxical
Discord ID: 427977072443654154
Wait... Ontology is the study of the nature of truth. Metaphysics is the foundation.
I'm an idiot
You too?
It's very quiet
mmmm
Your human existence is an agreement between truth and biology
Everything has an existential quality to it, except the abstraction of "truth" which is merely a model of reality.
Do you think I'm correct?
```
Fucket then, for another pit sammich and some taytoe salad, I'll go a few more
```
this pee has been brought to you by SESH
psssssssssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
whats a sesh
ill pop your knees b*itch
“Human existence is an argument between truth and biology”
Okay big fella
Ooga booga
Me use big words
Me think me smart
oof
Me live in Wakanda
wee
@Stefan Zuckerberger I'm not a troll, I'm giving everyone or that guy the general opinion from the alt right. More so, Ryan Dawson has done great work "exposing" zionism. There are some assumptions to be made of course, like Jewish homogenous thinking. I would also question the Intent which is important. Similar as to The British and Irish
The British caused the Famine in ireland which killed 1 plus million. However the general consesus around historians is that there is no proof of intent, no documents wanting this to happen, to be coordinated. There have been books on Zionism and there was conferences but not alot of proof of Intent. It it however a plausible theory.
I had some examples including the Trial on David Irving, where his opponents discredited him as bias rather than debating his claims and facts. And how holocaust denials threshold has been lowered to a trigger word use by those who feel guilty.
I had it typed, but it was deleted when I went over the word count. Anywho, that's it. Shortened
Can I get a link to your moral system? Do u have a paper written on it explaining the use of terminology? I would be interested in looking at it. If it is indeed difficult for people like here to understand, than unfortunately it may not be pragmatic enough for general populations. Would it be any different to Peter Singers Utilitarianism? Maximum well being, without the God tho.
"can i get a link to your moral system"
To me, Kants Book on Religion within the mere bounds of reason is a good example of how to extract an ethic for everyone to grasp. It has a foundation in tradition and customs. So it would surely have more success.
My mistake - video
thanks Mama
you cant function well in society if your morals can be defined by a single paper or video
if you bring the same philosophy into every situation that's stupid
oh i just read up
yeah this guy's full of shit LOL
Sup bitches
Sup bitches it's Chad warden
I'm here talkin bout dem gay niggas
Gay niggas suck dick
Dey look like a dildo