Message from @Wesleyy
Discord ID: 441516416655425546
So congrats bucko, you did it
What does this have to do with anything
Solving the issue you're complaining about
the issue I'm complaining about is people who use 4chan
It's not exclusive to 4channers
It's a widespread disease around the internet
h
you're not wrong
anyways
I need games
What kind of games do you play??
shooters mostly
The only games I've been playing now is Borderlands and Fortnite
Fortnite is cancer xD jk jk
I usually just play it with friends
@Wesleyy Do you have PS3? I've been playing COD:MW2 online the last few days
No
MW2 has some hella cheap shots xD
Wow a god damn champ we have here.
- Overuses "xD"? Check
- Calls the flavor of the month game shit but says "jk" to prevent criticism? Checkarino Motherfucker
- Still plays COD on his last-gen peasant console? Fat fucking check my guy.
consoles are actually pretty dope @Deleted User
Consoles are for fagsss
@Meddle#4094 nailed it
but i still dislike you
People are entitled to hate me even if they agree with me.
Gaylord
@Wesleyy don't go on 4cuck. 8ch is better
Lolz Consoles Succ
Can’t even Run Dark Souls 3 at 60 FPS
would anyone mind giving me a hand? I had a debate in my law class, it was around gun control. I had spent yesterday researching points against it as I was on that side. Afterwards, someone told me they were the same point, but simply extended to three. Would anyone mind confirming?
Point One
>Firearm classification too specific
>Elaborate, state firing modes (semi-automatic, fully automatic, bolt action, single-shot weapons)
>AR-15 classification, nor Assault rifle, not military grade, Modern sports rifle.
>Military Grade = M16 and varients, multiple firing modes
>Hunting rifles were once military grade (Mosin, Enfield, kar-98, Bolt Action) (M1 Garand, M14, semi-auto). Despite loading system, good Rate of fire.
>Light Machine Guns, Sub-machine guns, handguns
>Too complex, no blanket stipulations.
>BREAK<
>Rebuttle<
Point Two
>People lie, cheat, steal, kill to achieve goal
>this includes guns
>Mass-shooters already content with taking 50 lives, gun laws of no concern.
>Nuclear deterrant comparison & explanation
>BREAK<
>Rebuttle<
Point Three
>Objectively ineffective
>Australian statistics altered
>criteria for mass shooting before = 4+ casualties. After, Mass shooting = 6+ casualties
>Original critera shows no change in nunmber of mass shootings.
>gun control validity now called into questions
>Rebuttle<
Solution
>Switzerland's gun laws
>far fewer shootings in Switzerland
>Firearm saftey/education/culture
>Educate would-be gun owners on morales, saftey, and ALL legalities around guns.
>FIN<
It may be this person meant in the context of the actual debate, which was horribly organized and a failure on all fronts, but I want to be sure.
well, i think its fine i can see why the person says that but it doesnt look similar
The main points are
>Firearm classification
>Can't Trust people
and
>control is objectively ineffective
I don't see how those are the same point. They're interconnected, aye, but not the same point as far as I'm concerned.
yea thats where i think hes getting confused cause they're connected but not the same
*they
I'd lose my head if I didn't correct you on that
oof
they're probably over simplifying it