Message from @Farunel
Discord ID: 639397335302012928
surprise
PEOPLE WOULD GET LESS KIDS
Well cows are attributing to climate change with current methods
@Kathrine um no majority of people procreating are just idiots that get money from the government imo.
We're learning with Africa right now how controlled grazing is actually really helpful for the land
And is reverting a lot of lands from wastelands back to life
you have no idea what you're talking about and its so obvious
ofc it's good for the enviornment
people get more kids in the idea that some of them might survive
>cow eats grass
>shits a lot
But the amount of livestock we have is unnecessary.
if they have a 100% chance of survival people wouldnt need to breed so much
the amount of meat we eat is unnecessary
disagree
No, it's true.
We're not supposed to eat that much meat
Americans eat WAY higher than what is necessary.
um our ancestors used to eat quite a bit of meat that included livers brains and bones
we cant avoid our biological need for meat (looking at our teeth) but the amount of meat the average american eats every year is unhealthy as hell
disagree
Even our ancestors didn't feast on meat buddy
our biological need for meat was based on it's nutrient density
we dont need meat every day
Just let them be right
They had varied diets, and meat was an important aspect. But just because it was important doesn't mean they binged it.
they lacked meat so they made up for it via eating energy dense foods like veges
hunter gathers only ate meat when if became a necessity
Nah, we were more opportunistic
@Kathrine hunter gatherers literally ate meat in large quanitites exhibit A being eskimos first nation Alaskans.
We'd eat what was more available. It just happened to be that meat is more difficult to procure.
^
meat was a risk tho
Not always
hence why we ate veges and other plants to offset the risk
Are bunnies a risk?
Ducks?
meant more larger animals
We didnt often hunt large animals