Maybe don't elevate him

NoT

Guc

fuck

actually, they aren't the same in the eyes of the law

That's what I meant

Chris Hansen crimes are what

Auto correct

A fine?

Not even?

Okay but copyright shit isn't anywhere near the same as like what onion did?

A potential lawsuit?

that analogy about the robber and the murderer isn't really that good.

Yeah but he's still a dick for doing iy

Why

Two crimes

two different outcomes in punishment

Abusing his position as established media to force out competition that obeys fair use.

Not a good move

In a robbery you want to catch everyone at the same time.

"Chris Hansen is helping us catch this guy who's a known predator, wow what a guy."

"Yeah but he also littered outside a 7/11 one time, so maybe save the hero stuff for later."

Thats what you sound like tbh :/

Aggie, would you rather I caught the guy whole killed you or the guy who stole from you?

You don't just let ONE of them get away that's stupid, all parties no matter the crime have potential information.

certain crimes take priority

Yes they do.

First of all, nice sub-80 IQ

Second of all, that's a false equivalence.

@LiseranThistle

Told you I fucked up on autocorrect, obviously they do.

How is what I'm doing a false equivalence?

Littering/financially abusing innocent people

Not morally equivalent

nor legally equivalent

Its also not equivalent to the thing onion did which was what I was trying to say ._.

yep

and anyway, who cares if I wanna pat chris hansen on the back for trying to help in this situation.

idek why you all brought that up

adorable

Somebody toucha my spaghet

All my point is, don't dismiss crimes, Chris has some shit stuff too. I agree with Autism. Crazy enough.

awe

R.I.N Toki

Chris Hansen's crimes are not of my concern at the moment