Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 545439758252376064
@Antarctican Dictator nigger we're making IRC and Mumble
ok
That's why I delete
yeah i saw
yeah we're migrating that shit
alrighty
Two professors at Yale University believe they have identified the purpose. R. Polimanti and J. Gelernter of the departments of psychiatry and genetics looked at genetic data on five psychiatric conditions: autism (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Other researchers had already identified gene variants that seem to connect with each of these conditions, and the Yale scientists analyzed the data to determine whether the relevant genes were dying out or becoming more stable, or "fixed." Only autism and schizophrenia showed a high likelihood of being associated with advantageous (in an evolutionary sense) genes, and only autism “survived” all of the statistical tests they ran. Polimanti and Gelernter hypothesize that “certain ASD risk alleles [gene variants] were under positive selection during human evolution due to their involvement in neurogenesis and cognitive ability.” In other words, some of the gene variants associated with autism are also significantly associated with high intelligence. “Smart” genes are advantageous from an evolutionary standpoint, so they persist.
Hooray! Their conclusion validates my belief: research intended to eradicate autism is misguided. I've argued repeatedly that humans do not know enough to understand what we destroy along with the “unattractive” traits we seek to eliminate. And now here come these two scientists saying that many of the variants for autism also contribute to high cognitive capacity. Nobody knows how these genes interact to cause autism or intelligence. Nobody understands what other genes are relevant in causing a person to present with autism, high intelligence, or both. We do not know many things.
We did it
<:HappyPepe:392505275170684930>
lol
sgo
hmm maybe i could just own two cars, one modern one classic
although if i get a relatively modern one id get a 70 caddy deville
devilles still had tailfins in the 90s
although a 66 deville convertible for daily use would be more ideal for me and a 50s car for occasional use.
that or a 99 fleetwood limited
i just want a column shifted full sized car that can fit more than 4to 5 people
for daily use that is
yeah i'm a fucking boomer lol
Sal got called names by black people, making him tonight's biggest loser
Okay this is epic










