Pretty sure no other species was between homo sapiens and homo erectus @Puppet Master

Neanderthals evolved from homo erectus as well btw

I met a guy who was 7% neanderthal

looked like the chad meme

except he was short

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/637710669847986226/644005546428465161/image0.png?width=604&height=559

non of those are missing links

Neanderthal is not our ancestor

Exactly

Read the image

I'm arguing against evolution

I know neanderthal did

That's scientific fact

Neanderthals and homosapiens have a common ancestor but lived at the same time

The "missing link" has been found idiot

Pretty much all of man's evolution from proto ape to modern man has been mapped

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

There's actually a species between erectus and sapiens

Called Heidelbergensus or something

I have neanderthal forehead

the missing link has literally never been found and no scientist would ever agree with you on that

"There is little fossil evidence for the divergence of the gorilla, chimpanzee and hominin lineages" this is what the link you posted says. even your own link disagrees with you.

@Puppet Master firstly that's irrelevant secondly, where?

What missing link?

read the part about fossil evidence

My post?

There is little fossil evidence for the divergence of the gorilla, chimpanzee and hominin lineages.[113] The earliest fossils that have been proposed as members of the hominin lineage are Sahelanthropus tchadensis dating from 7 million years ago, Orrorin tugenensis dating from 5.7 million years ago, and Ardipithecus kadabba dating to 5.6 million years ago. Each of these have been argued to be a bipedal ancestor of later hominins but, in each case, the claims have been contested. It is also possible that one or more of these species are ancestors of another branch of African apes, or that they represent a shared ancestor between hominins and other apes.

The question then of the relationship between these early fossil species and the hominin lineage is still to be resolved.

ha did they delete your post? @OrthoNinten

Probably won't

No they didn't

Because this whole thing is a hoax

Bruh missing link how retarded are you @Puppet Master watching too much history Channel aren't we

no scientist would ever agree with you that a missing link has been found

Cause there isn't any

@Puppet Master you do realize that that has little to do with this argument. We still know Humans are related to ostrolipithicus africanus

carbon 14 in dinosaur bones, soft tissue in fossils, no missing link

Well done @Puppet Master, you just advanced to level 6!

how do we know? i just looked it up and it says it is "thought" to be an ancestor

I.e. there is evidence

To support that conclusion