Message from @khaos156-WV
Discord ID: 340151310236123147
based Kristall.
That quote doesn't support women being at violent events. In fact it countersignals it.
Nowhere in this video or that quote does hitler say its a great idea to have women assisting the SA by physically being out there for street demos
If you are going to push the irresponsible shield maiden nonsense at least dont slander a great man at the same time and make faggy flower swastikas.
@kristall.night or @Erika or others will you please fill in @lurlina | WV on the alternatives besides actually attending?
She wasn't pushing shieldmaiden stuff
@khaos156-WV It was h me who has objections to women
She's going to be at our group house performing womanly duties
@Hand Banana maybe you will fill @lurlina | WV on TWP discord then.
or someone please.
Have her send me a PM with her specific questions and I'll get her answers
OK. Thank you.
Godddamn it in a perfect world women would never be endangered and men would always be protecting them but the reality is that every last white woman in America is a potential nigger rape victim every time she goes in public. We need good publicity and people seeing women supportive of right wing traditionalism and white identity politics. The world won't come to an end if one or two get a bruise in a scuffle
And like I said half the opposition is fat women and men who identify as women anyway lmfao
If ACA is bringing their women I have no problem with that.
There will be plenty of publicized events that will have full women and family attendance that will make great publicity anyway.
Everyone involved in planning security for this event does not want women there. The event coordinators refused to put out guidance to that effect, and as a result women will be there.
Besides most Normie women won't want to join a movement if they think it involves doing crazy shit like rallies.
Most women are in fact not Signally shieldmaidens.
Yep. Agreed.
The way to get women attracted to a movement it to be seen as powerful and dangerous men who hold influence.
Yeah, at least the ones you would like to attract anyway.
The ones in it now were either redpilled by their men and so are unavailable or are "reformed" thot attention seekers with very few exceptions.
I can count on one hand how many under 30 have a kid
Normie women don't want to do anything political but will follow the heard when they are made to feel comfortable that it is socially acceptable. To be clear I want no women hurt and it's definitely better that they stick together away from the action but I think we hurt ourselves if they are not at the event in some capacity
The entire weekend will have events where both women and families attend that the press will report on.
Sounds good to me.
The only way for it to be socially acceptable is for us to become powerful and dominant. We dont need women at our violent rallies to be a powerful and dominant political movement.
Being part of a credibly dangerous and powerful group of men will attract Normie women who are the ones we need.
We will never ideologically make most women white nationalist. What we can do is make most women open to dating white nationalist men.
Who will then make them WN.
My girl is not exactly a normie but I will not be able to watch her either.
So seems like good deal.
Maybe someone could pin a post about this.
Ok I'm just saying at heart I agree we are to defend and protect women and if this is a danger to them I recoil at putting them in harms way but I hope we don't purity spiral too much because it's debatable that an all men army standing in front of a bunch of cat ladies, trannies, old hippy Boomers, and drug addicts looks good. I'll shut up now
From a media standpoint having only a few women there makes it worse than no women. It is far easier to say we dont take our women to violent events, and then to show pics of things like picnics than it is to show only a small group of women which the media can then point out how FEW women we have.