I mean, staying in the EU customs union requires all the other EU institutions

The EU themselves have said that.

"Lets continue with a disastrous policy **which people don't want**"
How do you know that?
Did't both Labour and Conservatives say that they would honour the results of the referendum?

but you know

tbh any brexit that doesnt involve resurrecting bomber harris and firebombing Dresden and Brussels isnt proper brexit

"How do you know that?"
By looking at the massive amount of polls which say people don't want that and the result of 2017. @Hiddenhope

Just keep shifting the goal posts to fit your argument

What? ...

"Oh no! Polls!"

"How do you know that?"
I just explained how <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

My argument has first being the polls, then I supported it using the 2017 election..

Looking up how many valid votes

There were 33,551,983 valid votes

do all the people who participate in your precious polls equal that number?

You really just asked that? ...

and how do you know there were was no overlap between polls?

You don't understand what or how polls are ran do you?

Well lets see how the next election goes

referendum > polls

Elections > Referendums

‭16,466,854‬ voted for remain parties in 2017, 13,636,684 voted for leave ones.

🤷 You don't have the numbers.

Both Labour and Conservatives said that they would honour the result
How can that be twisted to meaning remain?

Labour said they will remain in the customs union <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

To do that, you need to keep the other EU institutions

This was discussed YEARS ago

YEARS.

No use doing anything based on the 2017 election

Well that was the latest results we can use

I suppose you could use the European elections

But even there, remain got a majority of votes.

You know, there is one thing about elections.
You know about safe seats? And wasted votes?
In elections. Votes in swing seats matter more then ones in save seats.
But in the referendum a vote in the north of england matters just as much as a banker in london

I'm not looking at seats, because our system is broken. I'm looking at votes.

The number of individual votes, not seats.

Great for ignoring my point by saying the system is broken.
If we do get vote splitting. Were more people vote for the conservatives and brexit party, who are both leave. But the remain lib dems get in because they have the most votes.
I guess that would be fair for you.
Because your remain side would win.

Sorry: 13,929,001
That is how many people voted remain

> Great for ignoring my point
Your point is stupid, because it's dependent on SEATS which is flawed because of FPTP.

Again, your basing your entire argument on seats.

you know. Define which parties are remain parities and which are leave
Because apparently I don't know

I'm basing it on number of votes.

I don't care about the number of seats, because the system which determines the number of seats a party gets is flawed.