Secondly, before we put any rules in place (i.e. law) we must also consider why the law is a good solution, and why it isn't

Most people are social, they want to fit in
Some want to stand out
Both is true

An argument in favor of the majority is a poor one in my opinion

They don’t have to be mutually exclusive in some cases, which is paradoxical

Just a curious thing to point out

Anyway go on

Agreed. I think that behavior such as display of nudity is perfectly natural, and to argue that it's wrong or right must be put into context, because nothing works without context.

Like the dose of a certain food is what either feeds us or instead kills us

The exact same food can do either

Likewise, strictly forbidding all public nudity may sound like a bad idea, strictly allowing all public nudity may also sound like a bad idea. But both of those ideas must be tested against reality. Our personal beliefs won't help us with that.

That's the core of my argument.

I'm an advocate of patriarchy, so obviously I would ban the shit out of such degeneracy

Well public nudity isn’t a good idea, since it might cause problems with pedophiles like previously stated. But also in other areas such as a husband and wife go out and the husband is caught look at a girls jugs or the wife is looking at a horse cock. This might cause unnecessary tension here, for no good reason.
Even with a girls milkers out this will make people lust

Which causes tension between gf and bf

Just as one example

I take core arguments of traditionalism as axioms, there are no arguments around it

People would be free to leave my state if they want

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Public nudity as I see it likely won't cause any problems besides offending some people

Ever wondered why it would offend those people?

Cause they're against freedom of expression?

No

"no"

Expression for me, not for thee

Are you pro Child Porn

No

Why are you against Freedom of Expression?

Pornography requires consent. Children can't consent.

Are you pro CP that is not made using any children, but is generated using, say, AI?

If it's not sold or otherwise distributed but kept privately, I don't see a problem with it

That’s a oof

Why are you against the Free Market?

We can't test every single file for authenticity, children require added layers of protection.

That's why we make blanket rules for them, and for others, to protect them.

We can easily test whether it is made using deepfake or not

No we can't, the amount of fakes flooding the market would be insurmountable.

But hold on

Let’s say we can

Moreover, the consumption of CP itself doesn't violate your standards @ETBrooD

Just as a hypothetical

The private consumption of CP can be tolerated, since I don't want to make pedo lives miserable, I just want to protect children.