Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 640572022010806305
This is the same reason "corporate personhood" is a thing
again, ANSWER the question i asked
not the question YOU wish
you didn't even address it; just added more details
Maybe I can has a wasp nest as a pet
all of that which you stated i understand and agree with
if corporations are people, they be hella psychopathic people
but in a CRIMINAL case, the husband can testify as the owner of what was stolen even if the wife or business was teh actual owner
>> oh you have cancer and need insurance money? The best we can do is one dollar
this is NOT so under contract l aw
"A maxim is so called because its dignity is chiefest, and its authority most certain, and because universally approved of all. All law has either been derived from the consent of the people, established by necessity, confirmed by custom, or of Divine Providence"
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/maxims.html
Maxims are like axioms of math or amino acids in biology. They're the self-evident building blocks of law.
Again, you can understand the law by studying moral philosophy
yes, yes; twas joke
MA is upset because he can't legally divorce his wife
w/o losing a shitton of money
no, i am trying to get him to explain something i experienced in real life
with a certain criminal
who is now in a federal prison
you mean the scam artist your wife got tricked by?
"To one consenting, no injury is done."
Contract law supercedes all other law, except in the case of immoral consideration. Again, I can't contract to murder a third party. This is why lovemaking isn't rape and BDSM isn't assault and battery.
and who is the main reason as to why you want to divorce your wife?
criminal law has different standards and rules from civil law
MA, it would depend on the specifics of the case. There are always exceptions to every rule, I'm just explaining the theory behind the procedure
Did the scam involve a good dicking?<:thunk:462282216467333140>
the man in question and his shaddy attorney used thos edifferences in his schemse
in a criminal proceeding, the state doesn't CARE about distinctions
Shaddy = shady x shoddy
yip
Explain to me what went on in this case.
brb
the guys ploy was to make some unsuspecting property owner an unintended bailee
he'd dump equipment at a property under the guise of doing work as a subcontractor of a 3rd party; then he'd leave it there and file a theft claim
he'd wait until insurance investigation then have another one of his shell companies go get the equip and after 6 mo, apply for a new title with another shelll company and sell it for profit
when i demanded to see paperwork of ownership, not knowing who or why equip was on my property, he obsecured his identity behind his wife in order to attempt to extort money
How did he obscure his identity behind his wife?
if someone comes onto your property and starts something, you never saw him before but you call the cops to have he removed for trespassing
Was the property in her name?