Never use Israel as an example then, if n=1 is insufficient.

LMAO

Name countries that are **PRESCRIPTIVE** ethnostates?

Not countries like Iceland, Denmark, Japan.

Not descriptive. Name prescriptive ethnostates.

Because all you have is Isreal (which you hate), Nazi-Germany (which you pretend not to support) and something that existed in history prior to abolution of slavery in USA.

Because the entire ethnonationalist argument seems to be *"Look at Iceland. It's an ethnostate. It's cool (and not just the weather). There's no human rights violations that arise from being ethnostate...
thus lets re-institute slavery and kill all the Kikes. It's okay because Iceland is OK."*

Oh, I forgot South-Africa and Zimbabwe as prescriptive ethnostates or ethnostates-in-the-making. Very nice places and sure testaments to how prescriptive ethnostates are such nice places to live in (even if you are majority ethnic and the oppressor class).

No, I wouldnt call Destiny more slimy than JFG

Destiny tends to be a lot more arrogant than slimy imo

Iceland is pretty cucked in regards to firearms and imports

But TBF with a population of 300,000 and low rates of immigration, there's not much to mess-up their economy.

>TFW Iceland cucks a superpower over fish

@Monstrous Moonshine JF is a sophist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1jsWrQu7CQ

First ~20 minutes suffice to understand why

I watched that full video back when it was first posted by Alt Hype

It is a case of miscommunication

See this

https://www.bitchute.com/video/a5UQIWjMUxo/

JFs response to that video

It's miscommunication when JF claims the field of psychology is trash?

It's miscommunication when neuroscience is his own field of study, and he himself talks smack about such fields?

Neuroscience is different from Psychology

Neuroscience is the most reputable field of psychology

Neuroscience is biological study of nervous systems, Psychology is the study of behavior

Neuroscience is both biology and psychology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/talking-apes/201702/is-neuroscience-the-future-or-the-end-psychology

That's why it has such a high reputation

I don't think anyone thinks of Neuroscience as a subset of Psychology

That's just straight up wrong

And JF doesn't talk smack about Neuroscience, but only on Psychology in general

Neuroscience (or neurobiology) is the scientific study of the nervous system.[1] It is a multidisciplinary *branch of biology [2]* that *combines* physiology, anatomy, molecular biology, developmental biology, cytology, mathematical modeling and *psychology* to understand the fundamental and emergent properties of neurons and neural circuits.

From wiki

Again, watch this video, he makes his stance clear

https://www.bitchute.com/video/a5UQIWjMUxo/

@ETBrooD Yeah, still not a subset of psychology

He makes clear why he misrepresented the replication rates of new fields of study?

He *did* misrepresent the numbers, he *did* lie about them

Which numbers?

There's no other interpretation there

The replication rates