Message from @Nat

Discord ID: 636898953106817055


2019-10-24 12:02:33 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967804483371009/636897312907460627/IMG_20191024_134707.jpg

2019-10-24 12:02:54 UTC  

like.. you know they took where between 1,000 and 20,000 prisoners right?

2019-10-24 12:03:03 UTC  

did you ever hear about what happened to those prisoners?

2019-10-24 12:03:16 UTC  

Probably killed.

2019-10-24 12:03:30 UTC  

Hannibal had no active supply line.

2019-10-24 12:04:05 UTC  

used to clean up the battlefield to drag bodies to fire cistern... once all the bodies burned... they where thrown onto the cistern aswell

2019-10-24 12:04:06 UTC  

He only received one shipment I think

2019-10-24 12:04:07 UTC  
2019-10-24 12:04:14 UTC  

@ryvergate That's too wholesome for this server

2019-10-24 12:05:28 UTC  

If you meant shitshow by brutality, then yeah

2019-10-24 12:05:50 UTC  

Cannae is considered a near-flawless representation of a battle of annihilation

2019-10-24 12:06:24 UTC  

Most battles in history did not end with one side wiped out

2019-10-24 12:06:37 UTC  

yes, tho it when opposite what hannible wanted... and ended up gaining the same objectives

2019-10-24 12:07:03 UTC  

Wdym? Hannibal wanted to win.

2019-10-24 12:07:17 UTC  

His entire battle plan was geared towards the outcome.

2019-10-24 12:07:29 UTC  

he didnt want to annihilate them, cuz he feared it would alienate the romans and roman allies from joining his side... but then he did annihlate them... and it did alienate them... so much that they wanted to switch side

2019-10-24 12:07:53 UTC  

Weakest troops at the head and centre of an inverted crescent, strongest troops on the flanks, cavalry on the wings

2019-10-24 12:08:16 UTC  

If he truly didn't want the Roman army annihilated then he did a hell of a good job ensuring that it would be

2019-10-24 12:08:28 UTC  

yes we was pushing for a surrender... not a slaughter

2019-10-24 12:08:53 UTC  

Would've had the same consequences then

2019-10-24 12:09:03 UTC  

That was a cute meme

2019-10-24 12:09:06 UTC  

He couldn't sustain a large number of prisoners

2019-10-24 12:09:13 UTC  

They'd have to be killed anyway

2019-10-24 12:09:21 UTC  

Hannibal didn't have a supply line.

2019-10-24 12:10:03 UTC  

oh i know, im just saying his plan for that battle... and his plan for that battles aftermath... and his plan for the campaign... they werent exactly 1 coherent thing :p

2019-10-24 12:10:35 UTC  

I think annihilation was consistent to his character

2019-10-24 12:10:47 UTC  

As a child he swore never to be a friend to Rome

2019-10-24 12:11:36 UTC  

He wouldn't have been looking for leverage because he wasn't looking for peace

2019-10-24 12:12:26 UTC  

The Carthaginian Senate might've been though

2019-10-24 12:12:28 UTC  

Idk

2019-10-24 12:13:26 UTC  

btw the not annihilating them is referenced from both plybius and livy, tho both of them watched the battle from the sidelines

2019-10-24 12:13:39 UTC  

Lindybeige did a video on that battle

2019-10-24 12:13:48 UTC  

one hour vid irc

2019-10-24 12:14:23 UTC  

if you learned about that battle from lindybeige then your history teacher should be fired

2019-10-24 12:14:58 UTC  

Livy wasn't even alive

2019-10-24 12:15:09 UTC  

Oh no, I learned about the battle by reading books.

2019-10-24 12:15:20 UTC  

Lindy just made a video that I watched.

2019-10-24 12:15:33 UTC  

Also, Australian history sucks.

2019-10-24 12:15:38 UTC  

ur right livy was using after the fact refernces

2019-10-24 12:15:40 UTC  

they don't teach you much