Message from @Redxl

Discord ID: 635184036884512780


2019-10-19 18:25:07 UTC  

it'll crash hard

2019-10-19 18:25:08 UTC  

as long as people beleive they can cover their debts, the credit remains good. Eventually, a war or crisis illustrates that they can't cover their debts and all the influnec an credit moves to the place with the production base

2019-10-19 18:25:20 UTC  

this has happend BEFORE

2019-10-19 18:25:24 UTC  

and it's happening NOW

2019-10-19 18:27:11 UTC  

Ghost cities; can you think of a better way to move millions of peasants into the 21st century during a crisis other than telling them to go learn from that abandoned city? Building said cities was no different than the projects instituted by FDR during the depression

2019-10-19 18:27:39 UTC  

Run at a loss in favor of developing a production base and trained labor force

2019-10-19 18:27:50 UTC  

How much do I have to pay someone to abduct my waifu, Tulsi <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-10-19 18:28:26 UTC  

Standing up to Clinton, we need to get her out before she commits suicide by hanging and 2 bullets to back of head

2019-10-19 18:28:31 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-10-19 18:29:14 UTC  

Thing about those "cities" and their existence is due to construction companies taking advantage of shady government loans. the materials used only see them stand for 5 years before the shit quality starts to seem them falling apart

2019-10-19 18:29:51 UTC  

The tragic irony is that much of what China is doing is no different than the methods Donald Trump employed to make millions

2019-10-19 18:30:54 UTC  

Invest every penny in assets that retain value but keep very little liquitdity so you look just as poor as everyone else.

2019-10-19 18:31:02 UTC  

10/10 would not want to be in a Chinese earthquake

2019-10-19 18:31:41 UTC  

well, most cities won't survive very long if just left vacant; shit needs maintence

2019-10-19 18:31:49 UTC  

@ManAnimal answer my inquiry plz

2019-10-19 18:32:11 UTC  

inquiry? i must have missed it, sorry; let me look for it

2019-10-19 18:32:53 UTC  

90,000 deaths, 380,000 injured, 19,000 missing.

2019-10-19 18:32:54 UTC  

check ur @ s

2019-10-19 18:33:19 UTC  

May as well have been a thermal nuclear warhead.

2019-10-19 18:34:35 UTC  

High quality paper living in crammed spaces and not a god damn contractor following regulations.

2019-10-19 18:34:44 UTC  

You talkin about PACER, coolithic?

2019-10-19 18:41:12 UTC  

@Coolitic, PACER is like so many other technically feasible projects that we all thought would happen by the 21st century. Maglevs spanning the country, Hyperloop, flying cars, hydrogen infrastructure, space colonies, Thorium, self-driving cars etc. All of these are technically feasible. However, futurists are too often poor engineers and they forget that economics, not technical details make a program feasible. A company must be able to make a profit in order to pursue such projects and the largest portion of that profit equation has to do with the costs of liability and managing risk. Unless a company can find a way to externalize that risk, the program usually is never fielded.

2019-10-19 18:41:50 UTC  

but a big-ass cave serves as a good means of confinement

2019-10-19 18:42:52 UTC  

MA is doing some big brain shrooms again.

2019-10-19 18:42:53 UTC  

true, but anything nuclear has been given a stigma which makes the risk for developing and fielding the 'first' of anything too much of a risk

2019-10-19 18:43:40 UTC  

it's why most nuclear reactor designs in service today are literally 'boomer tech'

2019-10-19 18:44:26 UTC  

I like Canadian nuclear stuff, been there a few times. They're like big glowy swimming pools.

2019-10-19 18:44:27 UTC  

no one wants to be the one to stick their neck out and go through the NRC circus

2019-10-19 18:44:32 UTC  

I have no idea the context and I hate entering the middle of a conversation that seemed to have started half a day ago.

2019-10-19 18:44:58 UTC  

Climate evangelists should be the biggest advocates of nuclear power technology, but of course they're silent about actual solutions to the problem

2019-10-19 18:45:59 UTC  

that is true. they have actually done more to HURT nuclear by instead channeling that money into dozens of other less promising alternatives

2019-10-19 18:46:37 UTC  

We need our bald eagle culling machines though

2019-10-19 18:47:05 UTC  

Academics in my experience love nuclear energy, I'm a huge advocate for it. The UK is actively making it harder for it from what I seen.

2019-10-19 18:47:07 UTC  

generally, there are two reasons you do testing; 1) to determine if feasible; 2) to seek how much of a beating your product can empiracally take

2019-10-19 18:47:24 UTC  

academics focus too much on No. 1

2019-10-19 18:48:08 UTC  

Big oil companies fund misinformation and fearmongering campaigns about nuclear energy to preserve their chokehold on the energy industry, and retarded boomers lap it up

2019-10-19 18:48:26 UTC  

No. 2 is what proves you can reasonably meet a requirement and how much liability

2019-10-19 18:49:16 UTC  

nah, they don't actively fund misinformation campaigns. hell, BP is one of the major players that developed LNG tech

2019-10-19 18:49:46 UTC  

that's a function of marketing retards that don't know their ass from their elbow