Man

They only reason they can't do that now is because nobody can listen to 10 million microphones at once but AI is helping with that

I mean no doubt they will eventually but they don't really need to do they

Not really

The best secret police is everyone around you

I don't think that's going to really control them as well as you think sama

They have tanks and will just keep killing civies until they fall in line

AI won't be perfected for a long long time if at all

>tanks

Tanks are run by people

It will be perfected but not for a while but that might be within 100 years

Or people controlling machines

Computers weren't around 100 ago

So?

Relatively soon is the answer

And I said moving into the future not we're here

The development of AI:

It’s ages away
It’s ages away
It’s ages away
It’s ages away
It’s ages away
It’s still ages away
It’s ages away
It’s ages away
It’s here and everyone is dead.

I don't think we can say that conclusively by any means that's like Bitcoin troll tier speculation

black pillery

....but it is ages away.

From no planes to super sonic jets in less then 100 years

I spoke with an engineering instructor about this

Like

Yeah it's important

But it is objectively ages away

Everyone says so

Its not a bad assumption to say that from very basic facial recognition and tracking ai we could go to total control in that time span

Not even using true AI I mean

Technology and science tend to take longer than we think not shorter

It’s ages away until you get a machine that can program itself, then about twelve seconds later you’ve got a machine God in charge of the entire world.

It does but computers are already here its just the scale and complexity of the software

I think that wouldn't be the case. What would happen is

The machine would repogram bugs

And it isn't always that way sometimes its the opposite

The bugs would multiply

And the conditions for it to work would fall apart

The Nuclear bomb only decades after nuclear science become a thing for example

Okay but ut seems to usually be that way and I still think the bugs would multiply

Programs are subject to the programmer's errors

Depends on the amount of effort put into it tbh

No