True
Totally accurate.
Totally
Still he's not name dropping it's more so just throwing out ideas and concepts
So even if it was inaccurate it's not attributable
Babylon Bee gave me a 10/10 for truthfulness after Snopes investigated them
I'd sooner trust Snopes to rate whether water was wet tbh
Uhm.. erm.. yeah..
Though, Snopes would probably get that wrong, too.
And Snopes finds
Partially accurate - water is sometimes wet, maybe?
Well ackshully u see
>French give up faster than Communists starve under Communism
Also accurate
<:disgusteng:595338918044500041>
Wee wee
We cannot be killed if we do not fight sacre bleu
>Castro put gays in camps, so communism wasnt all bad
>Richard Spencer is a CIA plant. VC quotes Sargon's newest video as if everyone didnt watch it and that it was an original thought
>Jingoism bad
Why would the CIA give a fuck about smearing the alt right
Sargon made a video on Jingoism?
Like seems counter intuitive tbh
The alt right* like that the CIA gave spics syphilis
Plus the CIA and FBI love 4chan content they spend all day browsing the board
>Artemis Fowl is an asshole for not talking
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Eh, wouldn't put it past the CIA to have an over elaborate plot.
>"Artemis Fowl is an faggot for not talking"
Literally a Goldberg machine but with people
First we drop 5 cents in front of this office
>Artemis Fowl is typing
Dun....
Dun dun dun dun
>VC triggered at Artemis Fowl because he won't talk
Dun dun dun
>VC studdering
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLp_Hh6DKWc
CIA theme tune
if you listen closely
