aw no embed

@Flavius Stilicho Yellow Turbans?

you realize that armies arent perfectly spread on a front dont you?

>U.S. planned

Ah no you just have 2000 tanks concentrated in an area conveniently the size of Hiroshima

Makes perfect sense

kursk?

This disgusting clickbaity wording

how is it clickbaity

Making it sound like they were really going to

Ah yea Kursk, a battle which happened on a 100km wide front

it was just talking about the existing strategy

and supply lines

@Estavor.eldritch because if japan didnt surrender they were going to

No but if they say they planned to rather than

Alright fine whatever

because they did plan to

i dont know what youre hung up on lol

Okay fine fine

Wasn’t Japan going to surrender earlier if Hirohito stayed in power?

Not worth arguing I concede don't care not gonna think about it

but anyways

you use the nukes to obliterate most anything you want

veen with a small radius theyre tremendously useful

blow up shit tons of enemy factories in one go

destroy their entire supply chain

have a large concentration of enemies ina fortified position?

asexual pedophile

vaporize them

and so on

Yes American B 29 bombers would conveniently have the range to go on a 3000km journey from bases in Western Europe to the Urals

Oh wait no

what is greece?

what is finland?

Yeah

@King Canuck

A nation containing a freshly established British army contingent which would be obliterated by the Soviet Army in the first months of the war?

The nukes were just annihilation

Obviously

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck I was there for that initial thread actually..

funny shit