to me, gender is just the psychological manifestation of sex

period

falsification 101

how do you define behaviour

Idk mane Chinese people are just different

https://sciencing.com/innate-learned-animal-behavior-6668264.html

behaviour consists of actions a person takes in response to various circumstances

again, should me a single study that is correctly falsified

you won't find one

Who teaches your penis to get erect when you see a pair of tits?

it's pseudo science

This just feels like splitting hairs to be honest

it is

that is a physical response

not a behaviour

'aptitude' sounds like a specific word for defining behaviours that are innate

^

not a substitute for behaviour itself

It's been a splitting hairs and hypotheticals for a while -.-

so some behaviour is innate

and you're just calling them aptitudes

if you have an apptitude for math or for athletics.....

these are genetic

an erection does however meet the definition of behaviour

but that just increases the likelihood you will gravitate towards these things and ADOPT certain behaviours that you learn

MA, if you don't believe in innate behavior, then why would you ever disagree with the postmodernist IntFems who say that human beings are deterministic programmable blank slates? <:Pepe_of_akkad:462279833511264257>

those are completely unrelated

false equivolency

not really

in fact, IF behaviour was GENETIC, THEN this WOULD support determinism

I think we can draw a line between genetic behaviours that manifest themselves without conscious effort, and learned behaviours which require input and deliberation

it's in fact the exact opposite

I don't think *all* behaviour is genetic

I'd say some is

Except I never claimed all behavior was innate

Fight or flight

it's only deterministic if it fits whatever toxic narrative toilet paper degrees spit out for relevancy...

I think the learned behaviour would be built on top of how we behave naturally

the problem is that you cannot FALSIFY behaviour being genetic rather than learned

this is why it is bad science