i mean would you say robert mugabe is monarch

he was tbh

also there is a difference between slightly changing demographics and out right invasion

the mass immigration into europe is a invasion not immigration

yes have more kids yet it cost 20 grand up for one, the housing market is fucked, who looks after the kids...... see my point its lots of problems that add up to the result

if they are invading why dont you fight back

maybe you are exagereting a bit

becuase our leaders took our guns away

all of them have to be fixed not just housing or increasing birth rate

hahahahahaha

you have no idea

i mean what are we meant to use a pot and pan

a sword

@tea_in_space you still have potato peelers bro

oh wait

OI MATE GOT A LICESNE FOR THAT!!!!!!

licence*

OI M8 U GOT A LOICENSE FOR THAT LICENSE????

the issue for immigration to uk you could argue started in late 1940s, spec 1947 discussion and implementation in 1948

@tea_in_space example - henry 8th... was selfish... originally loved... but then he put his own wants over the needs of the nation... as an example his position as monach put him as head of the church of england and his marriage was basically him choosing to ignore his position for his own desires as his fiance was divorced with a living husband which in the 1930s was not a 'tenable position' and the people in general and church were against. he didnt care and got married anyways. by modern standards we dont care, but this is just 1 example

sorry

where the gov wanted to bring in immigrants to 'bolster' the workforce

edward the 8th*

not henry

but on the average a monarch's interests are normally in the benefit of the nation

Wot

they did this by changing the def of what it ment to be british citizen by expanding it to include the commonwealth

il give a link

its like corruption its much more difficult for a monarch to be corrupt since he would just be acting against his own benefit

u working on the fields of your absolute monarch for 18 hours per day is benefit to you?

or the nations benefit

giving to a person absolute power and not expecting him to be absolutely corrupted

wut utopia is dis

i mean thomas hobbes gave a example of why the monarchs interests normally benefit the nation but i can't quit remember how he explained this

ye and plato wanted an immortal philoshopher king

but thats why i believe more in absolute federal monarchy

both are utopic shit

well a federal monrachy means the decentralision of power

which means the king does not have all of the power

there for it avoids the problem of absolute power

can you point to me an absolute federal monarchy where its citizens/peasants live happily and with a great standard of living