well globalists and others are using democracy as a vehcile for fucking us over since it seems are leaders could not give a single fuck about for example the rapid demographic transformation of our nations

tea - the issue is if you dont allow something similar to the format of democracy... then you risk more than you gain... typically denying this results in being overthrown or a massive reduction in your country (in population and economy and treasury)

>implying demographics transformations arent natural

and the actual norm

well the demographical transformations were seeing now are not natural

were britons saxons before the saxons came to britain and conquered it

btw tea... because her majesty is basically the most awesome queen in existance... i can see why you might want the absolute monarchy... would you say the same for stalin?

the induction of the change is not natural

dictator ship is not the same as monarchy

it only takes a monarch who isnt awesome...

the reasons why its happening, as in low birth rate, is not understood

demographics change all the time

the problam isnt that there is democracy... the problem is that democracy is getting overriden

there are multiple reasons yet not one of them directly causes it, its a large blend of issues

people voted leave 4 times

if you want to compete with the brownies just have more children

yes the demographics do change

@tea_in_space how many children do you have bruh

yet the culture is also being affected/ attacked / undermined

i mean would you say robert mugabe is monarch

he was tbh

also there is a difference between slightly changing demographics and out right invasion

the mass immigration into europe is a invasion not immigration

yes have more kids yet it cost 20 grand up for one, the housing market is fucked, who looks after the kids...... see my point its lots of problems that add up to the result

if they are invading why dont you fight back

maybe you are exagereting a bit

becuase our leaders took our guns away

all of them have to be fixed not just housing or increasing birth rate

hahahahahaha

you have no idea

i mean what are we meant to use a pot and pan

a sword

@tea_in_space you still have potato peelers bro

oh wait

OI MATE GOT A LICESNE FOR THAT!!!!!!

licence*

OI M8 U GOT A LOICENSE FOR THAT LICENSE????

the issue for immigration to uk you could argue started in late 1940s, spec 1947 discussion and implementation in 1948

@tea_in_space example - henry 8th... was selfish... originally loved... but then he put his own wants over the needs of the nation... as an example his position as monach put him as head of the church of england and his marriage was basically him choosing to ignore his position for his own desires as his fiance was divorced with a living husband which in the 1930s was not a 'tenable position' and the people in general and church were against. he didnt care and got married anyways. by modern standards we dont care, but this is just 1 example

sorry

where the gov wanted to bring in immigrants to 'bolster' the workforce