Sort of, yes

However Carl talked more about the past still living on in our psyche

The collective unconscious is more the thing in its instance rather than throughout time though

Well the past lives in our psyche because our psyche inhabits the meta personality

And everything that affects something in a continuity tends to remain until it's contradicted one too many times

The question is how to get individualism and collectivism working hand in hand, that’s my deal

Our collective unconscious, meta-personality, it knows things that we just don't because it's simply observed with higher processing power for a longer time in different scenarios

True, the subconscious

well what are you calling individualism and collectivism

That’s difficult, the definitions change all the time

Well you must've meant something when you thought it

Which definitions did you mean

I guess individualism would be the individual working for himself, and collectivism would be the collective working for itself

Does it not already work hand in hand?

How to get a individual to help the collective and himself at the same time is my question

I think the short answer to your question is flow

Top down or bottom up?

I don’t know

Well an individual can only go from himself

But flow still to me seems to be the answer for how an individual does both things

However I will say individualism has taken off to much, individuals consolidating too much power and is only concerned with “profit for the sack of profit”

By creating social institutions that reform and adapt the collective as a whole while also instilling conditions which allows individuals to engage in flow, you get them to work together

What I see now days is the disappearance of social cohesion

I don't think that has much to do with individualism

Maybe it doesn’t

Anything that gets the best of both

IT's just the result of the traditional social institutions that usually regulated these things being broken down

Anyway I have to go, class is starting

Sorry to interrupt like this

But it was a nice talk

Flow is generally a way that satisfies individuals in experience and if you construct collective activities or group-survival actions into the framework for flow, then you'll most likely have gotten the best of both worlds

In very basic terms

gay

Maybe I should cum everywhere on you but not your vagina >:C

gobal warming isnt like "normal climate change" its an real problem that can be fixed but most of the worlds leaders dont care about saving the earth only about the MONY if you're an young person you should be seriously concerned of the well being about the planet many climate change denier's don't care about this becuse they wont be alive whean to worst effect of it heappening yo always say MUH CLIMATE HAS ALWAYS CHANGED um yes but that not what we talking about its about shitty people making shit shittier its not the end of the world however its the end of society as we know it hundre of millions of pepole will die becuse they cant grow they crop becuse of toxic gas in the air and pepole like sheldon dont care about it becuse he is an sicopath or something or maby he just dosent care witch you should while we waste our time bitching about sjw trans pepole and pitty drama gobal chaos that we have never seen before is facing us and we are not papered this shouldent be an political issue everyone have something to lose its time to stop aguring about if its real becuse we arlady have proof for it being real youre acting like flat earthers we should start doing everything we can papare for it.

Most world leaders are actually embracing tackling climate change, but mysteriously every solution applied just gives more and more power to a growing totalitarian state that increasingly gets more centralized

its not becuse they care they just want more votes

No I don't think that's true at all

They fabricated the issue so that people would give up personal liberties

They don't actually get that many votes based on this

But they do get more power in institutions